Article View: alt.flame.faggots
Article #42Re: The internet police
From: Dissident
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 15:05
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 15:05
28 lines
2784 bytes
2784 bytes
Alan Ferris wrote: > On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 01:46:29 GMT, "assimalated" > <assimalated@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > >>There is still abuse though by the isps. If they don't like what you say, >>they wipe you out. > > > ISP's like any company you buy a service from, have a contract. You > agree to that contract when you take that service. Break the contract > and they have a right to break that contract and remove services. > Your Terms of Service are there to be read by you, if you do not like > them then go to a different ISP whose terms you like. Snivelling like > a child about a broken contract is pathetic. Ah, but what if all the mattress companies in town required you to sign a contract promising never to have sex in their beds? Or what if the available phone providers monitored their lines, and cut you off forever if you ever had a conversation supporting Republican (or Democratic) candidates? Then the "sniveling" would likely be a giant roar. It's only called "sniveling" when a few people complain, it's called "the will of the people" when a lot complain, and then the sniveling is written into law and enforced by armed gangs (police). -B
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3E16F83C.2050002@7600.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!rwcrnsc54.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<0b2c2091d4d97045bc601eb1ceb7c627@paranoici.org> <av2fgp$77a$3@slb9.atl.mindspring.net> <3e15d85c$2_2@news.teranews.com> <3E1626F7.69B5@earthlink.net> <V1rR9.987$U05.534159421@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com> <o8kd1vsc4k8e5d33r2n57i1e1vhgn0m2j3@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 108be9,e60b649fb0f6bb3e X-Google-Attributes: gid108be9,public X-Google-Thread: 110106,c6af6f2e1796d0eb X-Google-Attributes: gid110106,public X-Google-Thread: 104ad1,e60b649fb0f6bb3e X-Google-Attributes: gid104ad1,public X-Google-Thread: 1100a3,e60b649fb0f6bb3e X-Google-Attributes: gid1100a3,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-04 07:05:23 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!rwcrnsc54.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3E16F83C.2050002@7600.net> From: Dissident <qqqq@7600.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.flame.faggots,dfw.general,soc.motss,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic Subject: Re: The internet police References: <0b2c2091d4d97045bc601eb1ceb7c627@paranoici.org> <av2fgp$77a$3@slb9.atl.mindspring.net> <3e15d85c$2_2@news.teranews.com> <3E1626F7.69B5@earthlink.net> <V1rR9.987$U05.534159421@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com> <o8kd1vsc4k8e5d33r2n57i1e1vhgn0m2j3@4ax.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 29 NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.118.36 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: rwcrnsc54 1041692722 12.234.118.36 (Sat, 04 Jan 2003 15:05:22 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 15:05:22 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 15:05:22 GMT