🚀 go-pugleaf

pat <patheinous@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote:

> In article <86nsc9$ekm$1@upa.usenet-performance-art.org>, 
> moc@xisabatad.tacdem says...
> > pat <patheinous@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > In article <86nbcc$koo$1@upa.usenet-performance-art.org>, Heimdall 2000
> > > (heimdall@(spamhacesuckage)usenet-performance-art.org) says...
> > >  |
> > >  V
> > > > On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 08:56:53 GMT, x@y.com (�|��) wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > >This is your brain.   The 2-Belo  is your brain on drugs.  Any
> > > > >questions?
> > > > >
> > > > >%Millennial Catastrophe is, like, you know, a homo, and stuff. Here's
> > proof:
> > > > >%>The Y2K-Belo <emperor-of-meow@alt.fan.karl-malden.nose.jp> wrote:
> > > > >%>
> > > > >%>> Field Marshal Sergi wrought:
> > > > >%>> 
> > > > >%>> >I was like "Oh my GOD!  No WAY!"  And so then moc@xisabatad.tacdem
> > > > >%>> >(Millennial Catastrophe) totally goes like:
> > > > >%>> >
> > > > >%>> >>�|�� <x@y.com> wrote:
> > > > >%>> >>
> > > > >%>> >>> This is your brain.   Millennial Catastrophe  is your brain on
> > drugs.  Any
> > > > >%>> >>> questions?  
> > > > >%>> >>> 
> > > > >%>> >>> % http://pages.eidosnet.co.uk/~fnord/nuke.html
> > > > >%>> >>> 
> > > > >%>> >>> 
> > > > >%>> >>> 
> > > > >%>> >>> NUKE IPSWICH
> > > > >%>> >>> 
> > > > >%>> >>> http://super-mojo.virtualave.net/blub/HAHAMEDCAT.htm
> > > > >%>> >>
> > > > >%>> >>"One or more Shite^H^H^Hockwave files are missing"
> > > > >%>> >>
> > > > >%>> >>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
> > > > >%>> >>
> > > > >%>> >>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
> > > > >%>> >>
> > > > >%>> >>*Spnak?*
> > > > >%>> >>
> > > > >%>> >>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!111
> > > > >%>> >
> > > > >%>> ><Jiffy Club>
> > > > >%>> >
> > > > >%>> >you need a better browser <g>
> > > > >%>> >
> > > > >%>> >then youd be able to see our pictures<vbg>
> > > > >%>> >
> > > > >%>> >instead of being a dumb textie<nod>
> > > > >%>> >
> > > > >%>> ></Jiffy Club>
> > > > >%>> 
> > > > >%>> <vader>
> > > > >%>> 
> > > > >%>> Do not underestimate the power of the WebCenter.
> > > > >%>> 
> > > > >%>> http://afk-mn.eist.co.jp/index.html
> > > > >%>> 
> > > > >%>> </vader>
> > > > >%>> 
> > > > >%>> NUKE NEW YORK
> > > > >%>
> > > > >%>***FOL___! You've led in with your biggest shot. Ivy Mike, at fifteen
> > > > >%>megatons, was the most powerful atmospheric nuke ever fired. Now what
> > > > >%>are you going to do when the whole world declares war on you and
> > > > >%>starts X-raying all your quaint little wooden cities (again) and
> > > > >%>all you've got left is a bunch of weeny little Soviet
> > > > >%>firecrackers and damp buckshot? HUH?
> > > > >%
> > > > >%A can of beans. A bad stomach. A lighter. 
> > > > >%
> > > > >%You figure out the rest.
> > > > >
> > > > >The Gastric Non-Proliferation Treaty specifically banned the use of
> > > > >intercontinental ballistic 2BFMPD (2-Belo Fiery Mexican-Pizza
> > > > >Defecation) weapons.  Further testing of such monstrous devices has
> > > > >been permanently discontinued.
> > > > >
> > > > >-- 
> > > > 
> > > > Actually, the largest nuclear weapon ever detonated was the Russian
> > > > "Tsar Bomba" on October 30, 1961.   Dropped from a Tupolev TU-95
> > > > bomber, and airburst, the bomb yielded an incredible 50 megatons!  For
> > > > comparision, the Hiroshima bomb was a mere pipsqueak at 12 kilotons or
> > > > so.  The "Tsar Bomba" was about 4000 times(!) more powerful than the
> > > > Hiroshima bomb.
> > > > 
> > > > Even so, "Tsar Bomba" was actually a 100 megaton bomb, but the yield
> > > > was intentionally reduced to 50 megatons in order to mitigate global
> > > > atmospheric fallout.  Mighty considerate of those Russkies to do so,
> > > > IMHO.  
> > > > 
> > > > Read all about it and other fascinating weapons of mass destruction
> > > > here;
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.fas.org/nuke/hew/Russia/Sovwarhead.html
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Another interesting trivial fact for your perusal.     During the
> > > > early days of nuclear testing, a number of scientists were concerned
> > > > about unexpected atmospheric chain reactions.  That is, the star-like
> > > > temperatures and pressures achieved during detonation potentially
> > > > causing a chain reaction igniting all the oxygen in the planet's
> > > > atmosphere.  Everything on earth might have been burned to a crisp in
> > > > a brief annihilating instant.
> > > 
> > > Oxygen doesn't ignite, it merely helps ignition.  I don't think there are
> > > high enough traces of explosive gasses in our atmosphere, and if they
> > > were, theyd be set off every time someone lit a match.
> > > Or something
> > 
> > Ever tried lighting a match in or near a liquid oxygen storage tank?
> > 
> > 
> Yes, I in fact work with oxygen, 

Don't we all, luvvy?

> and the reason they tell you this is 
> because they don't want you accidentially set off any oils or other 
> flammable agent's that may be around.
> OXYGEN DOESN'T BURN, IT PROMOTES BURNING.
> You cannot have a fire without oxygen, but without any type of fuel, you
> wont get a fire either.

Go on then. Drop a lighted fag into a tank of oxygen on your next break.
I promise I'll come and visit you in hospital. 

> Didn't you go to school?  This is common chemistry.

I did indeed go to school, and there I learned many wonderful things,
including the fact that many orbital lifters are fuelled by liquid
oxygen. 

-- 
 Medical Catastrophe     mhm23x23
 Mocking the afflicted since 1968