🚀 go-pugleaf

pat <patheinous@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote:

> In article <86q2t3$bai$1@herekittykitty.databasix.com>, 
> moc@xisabatad.tacdem says...
> > pat <patheinous@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > In article <86nsc9$ekm$1@upa.usenet-performance-art.org>, 
> > > moc@xisabatad.tacdem says...
> > > > pat <patheinous@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > In article <86nbcc$koo$1@upa.usenet-performance-art.org>, Heimdall
> > > > > 2000 (heimdall@(spamhacesuckage)usenet-performance-art.org)
> > > > > says...
> > > > >  |
> > > > >  V
> > > > > > On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 08:56:53 GMT, x@y.com (�|��) wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >This is your brain.   The 2-Belo  is your brain on drugs.  Any
> > > > > > >questions?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >%Millennial Catastrophe is, like, you know, a homo, and stuff.
> > > > Here's proof:
> > > > > > >%>The Y2K-Belo <emperor-of-meow@alt.fan.karl-malden.nose.jp> wrote:
> > > > > > >%>
> > > > > > >%>> Field Marshal Sergi wrought:
> > > > > > >%>> 
> > > > > > >%>> >I was like "Oh my GOD!  No WAY!"  And so then
> > > > > > >%>> >moc@xisabatad.tacdem (Millennial Catastrophe) totally goes
> > > > > > >%>> >like:
> > > > > > >%>> >
> > > > > > >%>> >>�|�� <x@y.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >%>> >>
> > > > > > >%>> >>> This is your brain.   Millennial Catastrophe  is your
> > > > brain on drugs.  Any > > >%>> >>> questions?
> > > > > > >%>> >>> 
> > > > > > >%>> >>> % http://pages.eidosnet.co.uk/~fnord/nuke.html
> > > > > > >%>> >>> 
> > > > > > >%>> >>> 
> > > > > > >%>> >>> 
> > > > > > >%>> >>> NUKE IPSWICH
> > > > > > >%>> >>> 
> > > > > > >%>> >>> http://super-mojo.virtualave.net/blub/HAHAMEDCAT.htm
> > > > > > >%>> >>
> > > > > > >%>> >>"One or more Shite^H^H^Hockwave files are missing"
> > > > > > >%>> >>
> > > > > > >%>> >>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
> > > > > > >%>> >>
> > > > > > >%>> >>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
> > > > > > >%>> >>
> > > > > > >%>> >>*Spnak?*
> > > > > > >%>> >>
> > > > > > >%>> >>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!111
> > > > > > >%>> >
> > > > > > >%>> ><Jiffy Club>
> > > > > > >%>> >
> > > > > > >%>> >you need a better browser <g>
> > > > > > >%>> >
> > > > > > >%>> >then youd be able to see our pictures<vbg>
> > > > > > >%>> >
> > > > > > >%>> >instead of being a dumb textie<nod>
> > > > > > >%>> >
> > > > > > >%>> ></Jiffy Club>
> > > > > > >%>> 
> > > > > > >%>> <vader>
> > > > > > >%>> 
> > > > > > >%>> Do not underestimate the power of the WebCenter.
> > > > > > >%>> 
> > > > > > >%>> http://afk-mn.eist.co.jp/index.html
> > > > > > >%>> 
> > > > > > >%>> </vader>
> > > > > > >%>> 
> > > > > > >%>> NUKE NEW YORK
> > > > > > >%>
> > > > > > >%>***FOL___! You've led in with your biggest shot. Ivy Mike, at
> > > > > > >%>fifteen megatons, was the most powerful atmospheric nuke ever
> > > > > > >%>fired. Now what are you going to do when the whole world
> > > > > > >%>declares war on you and starts X-raying all your quaint
> > > > > > >%>little wooden cities (again) and all you've got left is a
> > > > > > >%>bunch of weeny little Soviet firecrackers and damp buckshot?
> > > > > > >%>HUH?
> > > > > > >%
> > > > > > >%A can of beans. A bad stomach. A lighter. 
> > > > > > >%
> > > > > > >%You figure out the rest.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >The Gastric Non-Proliferation Treaty specifically banned the use of
> > > > > > >intercontinental ballistic 2BFMPD (2-Belo Fiery Mexican-Pizza
> > > > > > >Defecation) weapons.  Further testing of such monstrous devices has
> > > > > > >been permanently discontinued.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >-- 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Actually, the largest nuclear weapon ever detonated was the Russian
> > > > > > "Tsar Bomba" on October 30, 1961.   Dropped from a Tupolev TU-95
> > > > > > bomber, and airburst, the bomb yielded an incredible 50
> > > > > > megatons!  For comparision, the Hiroshima bomb was a mere
> > > > > > pipsqueak at 12 kilotons or so.  The "Tsar Bomba" was about 4000
> > > > > > times(!) more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Even so, "Tsar Bomba" was actually a 100 megaton bomb, but the yield
> > > > > > was intentionally reduced to 50 megatons in order to mitigate global
> > > > > > atmospheric fallout.  Mighty considerate of those Russkies to do so,
> > > > > > IMHO.  
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Read all about it and other fascinating weapons of mass destruction
> > > > > > here;
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > http://www.fas.org/nuke/hew/Russia/Sovwarhead.html
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Another interesting trivial fact for your perusal.     During the
> > > > > > early days of nuclear testing, a number of scientists were concerned
> > > > > > about unexpected atmospheric chain reactions.  That is, the
> > > > > > star-like temperatures and pressures achieved during detonation
> > > > > > potentially causing a chain reaction igniting all the oxygen in
> > > > > > the planet's atmosphere.  Everything on earth might have been
> > > > > > burned to a crisp in a brief annihilating instant.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Oxygen doesn't ignite, it merely helps ignition.  I don't think
> > > > > there are high enough traces of explosive gasses in our
> > > > > atmosphere, and if they were, theyd be set off every time someone
> > > > > lit a match. Or something
> > > > 
> > > > Ever tried lighting a match in or near a liquid oxygen storage tank?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > Yes, I in fact work with oxygen, 
> > 
> > Don't we all, luvvy?
> > 
> > > and the reason they tell you this is 
> > > because they don't want you accidentially set off any oils or other
> > > flammable agent's that may be around.
> > > OXYGEN DOESN'T BURN, IT PROMOTES BURNING.
> > > You cannot have a fire without oxygen, but without any type of fuel, you
> > > wont get a fire either.
> > 
> > Go on then. Drop a lighted fag into a tank of oxygen on your next break.
> > I promise I'll come and visit you in hospital. 
> > 
> > > Didn't you go to school?  This is common chemistry.
> > 
> > I did indeed go to school, and there I learned many wonderful things,
> > including the fact that many orbital lifters are fuelled by liquid
> > oxygen. 
> > 
> > 
> *sigh*
> I'm assuming you are being belligerant about this on purpose, but for one
> talking out of his ass, you do remarkably well.

Although I appreciate the compliemtn, let me hasten to remind you that I
am NOT talking out my ASS. It is in fact YOU who are talking out of his
FLACCID, STINKING RECTUM. 

> I did all a search of oxygen facts, and here's what I found.  I even 
> listed the URL's as proof:
> 
> http://www.life-assist.com/recallinfo.html
> "Oxygen does not burn, but oxygen supports combustion."

"life-assist.com?" I've come across them before. What a bunch of
weirdos! I bet they wouldn't know a PEER REVIEWED PUBLICATION if it came
up and bit them on the arse!

> http://www.medtek.lu.se/English/Education/oxygen/eallm.htm
> "Oxygen itself is non flammable but it supports combustion."

Swedish. Nuff said.
 
> I'm sure I could have found more if I really looked, 

Yeah, RIGHT, bucko! Those are the only two URLs you could find to
support your WEIRD, KOOKY thesis after a twelve hour session on
AltaVista. Kinda hurts to admit you're wrong, huh?

> but I figured this 
> would suffice.  I'm an aircraft maintainer by trade, and I'm constantly
> working around LOX (liquid oxyen) and traditional gaseous oxygen, so it's
> required reading to know about the materials you are dealing with.
> Guessing, the orbital lifters you are referring to used LOX to increase
> the combustion rate for a smaller amount of fuel.

NO mate, they are fuelled entirely by Liquid Oxygen! Why do you not READ
what I have written? Do you think I'm typing all this just for my OWN
PLEASURE? READ IT, IDIOT! NOW!!

> Cute little quip about everyone working with oxygen, and I'm actually
> surprised you weren't shallow enough to point out that I wrote agent's
> instead of agents.

Oh come come, I'm far too intelligent for that. I bet I'm more
intelligent than you, too. And my dick is at least twice as big as you.

-- 
 Medical Catastrophe     mhm23x23
 Mocking the afflicted since 1968