🚀 go-pugleaf

pat <patheinous@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote:

> In article <86ss4c$hp8$4@mews.databasix.com>, moc@xisabatad.tacdem 
> says...
> > pat <patheinous@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > In article <86q2t3$bai$1@herekittykitty.databasix.com>, 
> > > moc@xisabatad.tacdem says...
> > > > pat <patheinous@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > In article <86nsc9$ekm$1@upa.usenet-performance-art.org>, 
> > > > > moc@xisabatad.tacdem says...
> > > > > > pat <patheinous@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > In article <86nbcc$koo$1@upa.usenet-performance-art.org>, Heimdall
> > > > > > > 2000 (heimdall@(spamhacesuckage)usenet-performance-art.org)
> > > > > > > says...
> > > > > > >  |
> > > > > > >  V
> > > > > > > > On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 08:56:53 GMT, x@y.com (�|��) wrote:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > >This is your brain.   The 2-Belo  is your brain on drugs.  Any
> > > > > > > > >questions?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >%Millennial Catastrophe is, like, you know, a homo, and stuff.
> > > > > > Here's proof:
> > > > > > > > >%>The Y2K-Belo
> > > > > > > > >%><emperor-of-meow@alt.fan.karl-malden.nose.jp> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >%>
> > > > > > > > >%>> Field Marshal Sergi wrought:
> > > > > > > > >%>> 
> > > > > > > > >%>> >I was like "Oh my GOD!  No WAY!"  And so then
> > > > > > > > >%>> >moc@xisabatad.tacdem (Millennial Catastrophe) totally goes
> > > > > > > > >%>> >like:
> > > > > > > > >%>> >
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>�|�� <x@y.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>> This is your brain.   Millennial Catastrophe  is your
> > > > > > brain on drugs.  Any > > >%>> >>> questions?
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>> 
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>> % http://pages.eidosnet.co.uk/~fnord/nuke.html
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>> 
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>> 
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>> 
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>> NUKE IPSWICH
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>> 
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>> http://super-mojo.virtualave.net/blub/HAHAMEDCAT.htm
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>"One or more Shite^H^H^Hockwave files are missing"
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>*Spnak?*
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>
> > > > > > > > >%>> >>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!111
> > > > > > > > >%>> >
> > > > > > > > >%>> ><Jiffy Club>
> > > > > > > > >%>> >
> > > > > > > > >%>> >you need a better browser <g>
> > > > > > > > >%>> >
> > > > > > > > >%>> >then youd be able to see our pictures<vbg>
> > > > > > > > >%>> >
> > > > > > > > >%>> >instead of being a dumb textie<nod>
> > > > > > > > >%>> >
> > > > > > > > >%>> ></Jiffy Club>
> > > > > > > > >%>> 
> > > > > > > > >%>> <vader>
> > > > > > > > >%>> 
> > > > > > > > >%>> Do not underestimate the power of the WebCenter.
> > > > > > > > >%>> 
> > > > > > > > >%>> http://afk-mn.eist.co.jp/index.html
> > > > > > > > >%>> 
> > > > > > > > >%>> </vader>
> > > > > > > > >%>> 
> > > > > > > > >%>> NUKE NEW YORK
> > > > > > > > >%>
> > > > > > > > >%>***FOL___! You've led in with your biggest shot. Ivy Mike, at
> > > > > > > > >%>fifteen megatons, was the most powerful atmospheric nuke ever
> > > > > > > > >%>fired. Now what are you going to do when the whole world
> > > > > > > > >%>declares war on you and starts X-raying all your quaint
> > > > > > > > >%>little wooden cities (again) and all you've got left is a
> > > > > > > > >%>bunch of weeny little Soviet firecrackers and damp buckshot?
> > > > > > > > >%>HUH?
> > > > > > > > >%
> > > > > > > > >%A can of beans. A bad stomach. A lighter. 
> > > > > > > > >%
> > > > > > > > >%You figure out the rest.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >The Gastric Non-Proliferation Treaty specifically banned
> > > > > > > > >the use of intercontinental ballistic 2BFMPD (2-Belo Fiery
> > > > > > > > >Mexican-Pizza Defecation) weapons.  Further testing of such
> > > > > > > > >monstrous devices has been permanently discontinued.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >-- 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Actually, the largest nuclear weapon ever detonated was the
> > > > > > > > Russian "Tsar Bomba" on October 30, 1961.   Dropped from a
> > > > > > > > Tupolev TU-95 bomber, and airburst, the bomb yielded an
> > > > > > > > incredible 50 megatons!  For comparision, the Hiroshima bomb
> > > > > > > > was a mere pipsqueak at 12 kilotons or so.  The "Tsar Bomba"
> > > > > > > > was about 4000 times(!) more powerful than the Hiroshima
> > > > > > > > bomb.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Even so, "Tsar Bomba" was actually a 100 megaton bomb, but
> > > > > > > > the yield was intentionally reduced to 50 megatons in order
> > > > > > > > to mitigate global atmospheric fallout.  Mighty considerate
> > > > > > > > of those Russkies to do so, IMHO.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Read all about it and other fascinating weapons of mass
> > > > > > > > destruction here;
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > http://www.fas.org/nuke/hew/Russia/Sovwarhead.html
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Another interesting trivial fact for your perusal.
> > > > > > > > During the early days of nuclear testing, a number of
> > > > > > > > scientists were concerned about unexpected atmospheric chain
> > > > > > > > reactions.  That is, the star-like temperatures and
> > > > > > > > pressures achieved during detonation potentially causing a
> > > > > > > > chain reaction igniting all the oxygen in the planet's
> > > > > > > > atmosphere.  Everything on earth might have been burned to a
> > > > > > > > crisp in a brief annihilating instant.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Oxygen doesn't ignite, it merely helps ignition.  I don't think
> > > > > > > there are high enough traces of explosive gasses in our
> > > > > > > atmosphere, and if they were, theyd be set off every time someone
> > > > > > > lit a match. Or something
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Ever tried lighting a match in or near a liquid oxygen storage tank?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > Yes, I in fact work with oxygen, 
> > > > 
> > > > Don't we all, luvvy?
> > > > 
> > > > > and the reason they tell you this is 
> > > > > because they don't want you accidentially set off any oils or other
> > > > > flammable agent's that may be around.
> > > > > OXYGEN DOESN'T BURN, IT PROMOTES BURNING.
> > > > > You cannot have a fire without oxygen, but without any type of
> > > > > fuel, you wont get a fire either.
> > > > 
> > > > Go on then. Drop a lighted fag into a tank of oxygen on your next break.
> > > > I promise I'll come and visit you in hospital. 
> > > > 
> > > > > Didn't you go to school?  This is common chemistry.
> > > > 
> > > > I did indeed go to school, and there I learned many wonderful things,
> > > > including the fact that many orbital lifters are fuelled by liquid
> > > > oxygen. 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > *sigh*
> > > I'm assuming you are being belligerant about this on purpose, but for one
> > > talking out of his ass, you do remarkably well.
> > 
> > Although I appreciate the compliemtn, let me hasten to remind you that I
> > am NOT talking out my ASS. It is in fact YOU who are talking out of his
> > FLACCID, STINKING RECTUM. 
> > 
> > > I did all a search of oxygen facts, and here's what I found.  I even
> > > listed the URL's as proof:
> > > 
> > > http://www.life-assist.com/recallinfo.html
> > > "Oxygen does not burn, but oxygen supports combustion."
> > 
> > "life-assist.com?" I've come across them before. What a bunch of
> > weirdos! I bet they wouldn't know a PEER REVIEWED PUBLICATION if it came
> > up and bit them on the arse!
> > 
> > > http://www.medtek.lu.se/English/Education/oxygen/eallm.htm
> > > "Oxygen itself is non flammable but it supports combustion."
> > 
> > Swedish. Nuff said.
> >  
> > > I'm sure I could have found more if I really looked, 
> > 
> > Yeah, RIGHT, bucko! Those are the only two URLs you could find to
> > support your WEIRD, KOOKY thesis after a twelve hour session on
> > AltaVista. Kinda hurts to admit you're wrong, huh?
> > 
> > > but I figured this 
> > > would suffice.  I'm an aircraft maintainer by trade, and I'm constantly
> > > working around LOX (liquid oxyen) and traditional gaseous oxygen, so it's
> > > required reading to know about the materials you are dealing with.
> > > Guessing, the orbital lifters you are referring to used LOX to increase
> > > the combustion rate for a smaller amount of fuel.
> > 
> > NO mate, they are fuelled entirely by Liquid Oxygen! Why do you not READ
> > what I have written? Do you think I'm typing all this just for my OWN
> > PLEASURE? READ IT, IDIOT! NOW!!
> > 
> > > Cute little quip about everyone working with oxygen, and I'm actually
> > > surprised you weren't shallow enough to point out that I wrote agent's
> > > instead of agents.
> > 
> > Oh come come, I'm far too intelligent for that. I bet I'm more
> > intelligent than you, too. And my dick is at least twice as big as you.
> > 
> > 
> http://www.spaceline.org/history/33.html
> "combination of liquid oxygen and gasoline"

Written by a known KOOK and PAEDOPHILE.


> http://www.kipertek.com/spaceline/history/32.html
> "combination of liquid oxygen and gasoline"

THE SAME BLOODY ARTICLE. YOU DONT THINK YOU CAN FOOL ME SO EASILY>???


> http://www.vuse.vanderbilt.edu/~aesinfo/es/_vti_pvt/rockerty.htm
> "liquid oxygen and gasoline"

LIKE I'M GOING TO TRUST AN ARTICLE WRITTEN BY AN WEBSITE WHO CANT EVEN
SPELL ITS OWN URL CORRECTLY! "rockerty"??? I suppose they are a garden
centre and are trying to spell ROCKERY??? Or what??? YOU TELL ME! DUH!!


> 
> I looked in Yahoo (I typed in "liquid oxygen fueled rockets") and this is
> what I found on the first page of the search results.
> Know what I find hilarious?  

I don't know. What do you find hilarious? The size of your TINY LITTLE
COCK? That TRAGICOMICAL ARRANGEMENT OF FLESHY LUMPS ON THE FRONT OF YOUR
HEAD THAT YOU CALL A FACE?? WATCHING PUPPIES GETTING FED INTO A MEAT
GRINDER??? I give up! Tell me what you find hilarious! I'M FUCKING DYING
TO KNOW!!! CAN'T YOU SEE ME DYING??? FUCK YOU!  WHAT DO YOU FIND
HILARIOUS?


> The fact that you claim to be so 
> intelligent, yet you can't even argue without calling me names.  You 
> can't even show me anything to back up your bullshit!

I don't need to show you anything as any child can see that your
laughable fishing yarn about oxygen being inflammable. ALSO I am well
known among my peers for my large IQ which is certainly at least twice
as big as YOURS.


> What a pushover.
> It's like beating a two year-old at basketball.
> It's like the Nazi's rolling into France unmolested.

You mentioned Nazis. According to Gosling's Law, you lose. You already
lost anyway, AND HERE YOU GO LOSING AGAIN ALREADY. What are you going
for the WORLD LOSING RECORD IN ONE POST? 

> It's like you being turned down from girls, again and again.

You're the one writing your SAD, PATHETIC little REPLY all alone AT YOUR
CRAPPY COMPUTER on a FRIDAY NIGHT when I was DOWN THE PUB and SHORTLY
AFTERWARDS GETTING FUCKED ROTTEN by the VERY LOVELY MISS HACKNEY 1996!
You sad, sad LOSER.

> Anyway, I'm finished with this, 

Because you LOST.

> so you can continue to "refute" my 
> replies 

And shall do until the COWS COME HOME.


> or whatever you think you're doing, 

I know what I'm doing SONNY JIM, it's such a shame you're too PATHETIC
AND SAD to see it too. "DUH? WHAT MC DO? UH? <drool>"

> but next time you shoot your 
> mouth off, maybe you should do a little research beforehand.

I'd love to stay and chat with you pat (what low self-esteem you must
have if you don't even spell your name with a capital!) but I have a
slot on the supercollider and I don't want to be late. Ciao!

-- 
 Medical Catastrophe     mhm23x23
 Mocking the afflicted since 1968

PS: YOU LOSE!