🚀 go-pugleaf

In <53gpp1$sie@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> norapeal@staff.uiuc.edu (peal nora
c) writes: 

In which our pusillanimous "Princess Nora" repeats the 
stunt of her flunky, Xemblinosky, which represented the 
gleaning of a few typos from several thousand correctly 
spelled, grammatically precise, and--by any standard means 
of measurement--highly coherent words of mine.  Like her 
greasy, typo-pouncing ferret "subject", Raoul, she 
dishonestly clusters those typos in a barren attempt to 
malign several well-written posts--and in effect--me, 
their writer.  (see my "Woof Busted Stacking Deck" of 
yesterday.)
>
>Raoul Xemblinosky <raoulx@xi.netcom.com> writes:
>
>>Bill Palmer typed:
>>> 
>>> In <32598CB9.39A9@xi.netcom.com> Raoul Xemblinosky
>>> <raoulx@xi.netcom.com> writes:
>>> 
>>> Raoul, I'm "amazed"!  After your sleazy, failed attempt
>>> to demonstrate "incoherence" on my part in your other
>>> post, you skitter off like a poltroon.
>
>>Why would I attempt to demonstrate "incoherence" on your
>>part when you do such a wonderful job of demonstrating
>>it on your own?
>
>>> you seem to totally do an about face here.  
>
>>Split infinitive.

The fact is, since most language authorities have
for the greater part of this century sanctioned 
"split-infinitive" constructions (such as mine above) 
as correct in colloquial English, you prove yourself 
very much the pitiful-wanna-be-pedant-with-the-dusty-
bag-of-obsolete-pronouncements, "Princess Nora"--when 
you give credence to Raoul's sophomoric, pseudo-
intellectual stylistic pontification.
>
>>> Raoul, are you saying that despite your shabby try at 
>>> avoiding the consequences of your intellectual cowardice 
>>> by cobbling together a spurious and ludicrous scheme to
>>> misuse an occasional typo to divert attention from your
>>> prior invertebrate behavior--you have suddenly given
>>> up?  I'm shocked.  On the other hand, all you do
>>> (below) by way of responding to my pinpointing 
>>> your typo-pouncing nature is retort with a crude,
>>> troglodyte insult in lieu of any reasoned rebuttal.

Typo in "rebuttal" (in the above line) corrected.
>
>>"Rubuttal?"  You've been staring at those RuPaul pictures
>>too long, Billie.  What you need is a *real* woman like
>>UZOcandybabe!  If she'd take you, of course.

Yes, Mr. "Einstein" Xemblinosky, you did find the 
one typo in several hundred otherwise fully coherent 
words.  I'm glad the "princess" sees fit to emphasize
your "cleverness" and "creativity".
>
>>> Franky, Raoul, I don't know which is worse: a cowardly,
>
>>"Franky?"  Who the fuck is "Franky?"

Yes, Mr. "Victor Hugo" Xemblinosky, you showed us
your "immense writing talent" by finding another
typo in several hundred more words.  Congratulations
on your "brilliant intellectual achievement".
I'm so delighted that your "princess" has noted
your "achievement".  
>
>>> greasy, typo-pouncing ferret; or a moran who fancies
>
>>A "moran?"

Yes, Mr. "Cervantes" Xemblinosky.  You have proven 
you "wit" and "imagination" once again by diligently
searching out another typo.  How superb that your 
"princess" has noted your "amazing feat".
>
>Uh oh...NOW you've done it!  Just ask Wotan ;-)

Should we end by saying, "Like 'princess', like
peon," or would that be too honest and politically
incorrect for name-mangling, typo-pouncing, ferret
Xemblinosky?

copyright FLAME GIANT
>
>