🚀 go-pugleaf

("The Nose" added to the headers because Palmer was afraid to do it)

Bill Palmer typed:
> 
> In <53gpp1$sie@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> norapeal@staff.uiuc.edu (peal nora
> c) writes:
> 
> In which our pusillanimous "Princess Nora" repeats the
> stunt of her flunky, Xemblinosky, which represented the
> gleaning of a few typos from several thousand correctly
> spelled, grammatically precise, and--by any standard means
> of measurement--highly coherent words of mine.  Like her
> greasy, typo-pouncing ferret "subject", Raoul, she
> dishonestly clusters those typos in a barren attempt to
> malign several well-written posts--and in effect--me,
> their writer.  (see my "Woof Busted Stacking Deck" of
> yesterday.)
> >
> >Raoul Xemblinosky <raoulx@xi.netcom.com> writes:
> >
> >>Bill Palmer typed:
> >>>
> >>> In <32598CB9.39A9@xi.netcom.com> Raoul Xemblinosky
> >>> <raoulx@xi.netcom.com> writes:
> >>>
> >>> Raoul, I'm "amazed"!  After your sleazy, failed attempt
> >>> to demonstrate "incoherence" on my part in your other
> >>> post, you skitter off like a poltroon.
> >
> >>Why would I attempt to demonstrate "incoherence" on your
> >>part when you do such a wonderful job of demonstrating
> >>it on your own?
> >
> >>> you seem to totally do an about face here.
> >
> >>Split infinitive.
> 
> The fact is, since most language authorities have
> for the greater part of this century sanctioned
> "split-infinitive" constructions (such as mine above)
> as correct in colloquial English, you prove yourself
> very much the pitiful-wanna-be-pedant-with-the-dusty-
> bag-of-obsolete-pronouncements, "Princess Nora"--when
> you give credence to Raoul's sophomoric, pseudo-
> intellectual stylistic pontification.

You blew it, Flame Gnat.  I was the one who picked out
your split infinitive, thereby sparing our Poetess Laureate
the trouble.  I find it amusing that in one post you 
pride yourself on the complexity of your syntax, while
in another you attempt to defend an infinitely avoidable
boo-boo as "colloquial."  

> >>> Raoul, are you saying that despite your shabby try at
> >>> avoiding the consequences of your intellectual cowardice
> >>> by cobbling together a spurious and ludicrous scheme to
> >>> misuse an occasional typo to divert attention from your
> >>> prior invertebrate behavior--you have suddenly given
> >>> up?  I'm shocked.  On the other hand, all you do
> >>> (below) by way of responding to my pinpointing
> >>> your typo-pouncing nature is retort with a crude,
> >>> troglodyte insult in lieu of any reasoned rebuttal.
> 
> Typo in "rebuttal" (in the above line) corrected.
> >
> >>"Rubuttal?"  You've been staring at those RuPaul pictures
> >>too long, Billie.  What you need is a *real* woman like
> >>UZOcandybabe!  If she'd take you, of course.
> 
> Yes, Mr. "Einstein" Xemblinosky, you did find the
> one typo in several hundred otherwise fully coherent
> words.  I'm glad the "princess" sees fit to emphasize
> your "cleverness" and "creativity".

Have you contacted UZOcandybabe yet, or are you still
fixated on RuPaul's butt?

> >
> >>> Franky, Raoul, I don't know which is worse: a cowardly,
> >
> >>"Franky?"  Who the fuck is "Franky?"
> 
> Yes, Mr. "Victor Hugo" Xemblinosky, you showed us
> your "immense writing talent" by finding another
> typo in several hundred more words.  Congratulations
> on your "brilliant intellectual achievement".
> I'm so delighted that your "princess" has noted
> your "achievement".

Nora is not my Princess; she is the Poetess Laureate of
alt.fan.karl-malden.nose.  "Princess" is an alias of
UZOcandybabe, who, for the right price, might still be
willing to make a real man out of you.  Just think:
RuPaul with real breasts and real female genitalia!

> >>> greasy, typo-pouncing ferret; or a moran who fancies
> >
> >>A "moran?"
> 
> Yes, Mr. "Cervantes" Xemblinosky.  You have proven
> you "wit" and "imagination" once again by diligently
> searching out another typo.  How superb that your
> "princess" has noted your "amazing feat".

Diligently?  Finding misspellings and solecisms in your
demented typing is like finding shit in a crowded stable.
In fact, it's *exactly* like finding shit in a crowded
stable.  Right down to the smell.

> >Uh oh...NOW you've done it!  Just ask Wotan ;-)
> 
> Should we end by saying, "Like 'princess', like
> peon," or would that be too honest and politically
> incorrect for name-mangling, typo-pouncing, ferret
> Xemblinosky?

Ethnic slur #3 is duly noted, Flame Gnat.  Good job.

> copyright FLAME GNAT

----------------------------------------------------------
   "Two whole typos in a post of several hundred words!  
      Clealy, sir, have proved me factually wrong..."

 "Mr. Bill" Palmer in <536gnl$hjg@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com>