Article View: alt.folklore.science
Article #1045Re: Human bodies explode in vacuum?
From: Ketil M. Malde
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 20:38
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 20:38
43 lines
2856 bytes
2856 bytes
>>>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 92 19:36:10 GMT, mayne@phi.cs.fsu.edu (William Mayne) said: William> Has anyone here experienced breathing difficulty due to increased gas William> density? I don't doubt that it can happen at extreme depths, though : William> deeper than 130 feet on air. I have remembered to pay attention, too. William> At what depth does this happen? I've heard that you notice the higher density at large depths (say 200 meters ~600ft) but I can't remember where I heard it... :-/ William> Then either your idea of what constitutes "some William> detail" is different than mine or your PADI course William> was much better than mine. When I took open water William> narcosis was covered in a few sentences and the other William> topics mentioned even less, if at all. On the other William> hand if you stay within PADI limits it is easy to William> argue that such knowledge isn't very important. Jeez, I can see why the CMAS people are looking down on the PADI certificate. You actually dive to 130 feet without any knowledge of N2-narcosis? William> I don't think that decompression is the only or even William> the main reason to be cautious about going deep. I William> doubt that most people could do a successful free William> ascent from 130 feet in case of total air loss, William> starting without a fresh breath. At least it would be William> risky. Also air supply goes quickly at depth and I'm William> told that some people actually don't have it together William> well enough to monitor their time, depth, and air William> supply. One is advised not to go deeper than 20m on the first CMAS certificate (**) and 30m on the second (***) When you go deeper, you lose much bottom time, and besides there's not a lot down there anyway (except wrecks of course, but then again, you shouldn't really be messing about with those unless you know that you know what you're doing) -- = Ketil Malde In real life: ketil@ii.uib.no = = Nuke the whales! Honk if you love unicorns! =
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<KETIL.92Nov18203826@sandel.ii.uib.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!ugle.unit.no!alf.uib.no!alf.uib.no!ketilReferences:
<1992Nov13.190025.6323@digi.lonestar.org> <1992Nov16.145038.23449@geac.com> <1992Nov17.153453.7235@digi.lonestar.org> <1992Nov17.193610.14444@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.science,sci.misc,rec.arts.startrek.tech,rec.scuba Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!ugle.unit.no!alf.uib.no!alf.uib.no!ketil From: ketil@ii.uib.no (Ketil M. Malde) Subject: Re: Human bodies explode in vacuum? In-Reply-To: mayne@phi.cs.fsu.edu's message of Tue, 17 Nov 92 19:36:10 GMT Message-ID: <KETIL.92Nov18203826@sandel.ii.uib.no> Sender: usenet@alf.uib.no (Bergen University Newsaccount) Reply-To: ketil@ii.uib.no Organization: student of numerical analysis at the University of Bergen, Norway References: <1992Nov13.190025.6323@digi.lonestar.org> <1992Nov16.145038.23449@geac.com> <1992Nov17.153453.7235@digi.lonestar.org> <1992Nov17.193610.14444@mailer.cc.fsu.edu> Date: 18 Nov 92 20:38:26 Lines: 43