🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.folklore.science
Article #1045

Re: Human bodies explode in vacuum?

#1045
From: Ketil M. Malde
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 20:38
43 lines
2856 bytes
>>>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 92 19:36:10 GMT, mayne@phi.cs.fsu.edu (William Mayne) said:

	William> Has anyone here experienced breathing difficulty due to increased gas
	William> density? I don't doubt that it can happen at extreme depths, though
		 :
	William> deeper than 130 feet on air. I have remembered to pay attention, too.
	William> At what depth does this happen?

I've heard that you notice the higher density at large depths (say 200
meters ~600ft) but I can't remember where I heard it... :-/

	William> Then either your idea of what constitutes "some
	William> detail" is different than mine or your PADI course
	William> was much better than mine. When I took open water
	William> narcosis was covered in a few sentences and the other
	William> topics mentioned even less, if at all. On the other
	William> hand if you stay within PADI limits it is easy to
	William> argue that such knowledge isn't very important.

Jeez, I can see why the CMAS people are looking down on the PADI
certificate.  You actually dive to 130 feet without any knowledge of
N2-narcosis? 

	William> I don't think that decompression is the only or even
	William> the main reason to be cautious about going deep. I
	William> doubt that most people could do a successful free
	William> ascent from 130 feet in case of total air loss,
	William> starting without a fresh breath. At least it would be
	William> risky. Also air supply goes quickly at depth and I'm
	William> told that some people actually don't have it together
	William> well enough to monitor their time, depth, and air
	William> supply.

One is advised not to go deeper than 20m on the first CMAS
certificate (**) and 30m on the second (***)  When you go deeper, you
lose much bottom time, and besides there's not a lot down there anyway
(except wrecks of course, but then again, you shouldn't really be
messing about with those unless you know that you know what you're doing)


--
 = Ketil Malde                     In real life:  ketil@ii.uib.no =
 = Nuke the whales!                    Honk if you love unicorns! =
Technical Details
Message-ID: <KETIL.92Nov18203826@sandel.ii.uib.no>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!ugle.unit.no!alf.uib.no!alf.uib.no!ketil
References: <1992Nov13.190025.6323@digi.lonestar.org> <1992Nov16.145038.23449@geac.com> <1992Nov17.153453.7235@digi.lonestar.org> <1992Nov17.193610.14444@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.science,sci.misc,rec.arts.startrek.tech,rec.scuba
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!ugle.unit.no!alf.uib.no!alf.uib.no!ketil
From: ketil@ii.uib.no (Ketil M. Malde)
Subject: Re: Human bodies explode in vacuum?
In-Reply-To: mayne@phi.cs.fsu.edu's message of Tue, 17 Nov 92 19:36:10 GMT
Message-ID: <KETIL.92Nov18203826@sandel.ii.uib.no>
Sender: usenet@alf.uib.no (Bergen University Newsaccount)
Reply-To: ketil@ii.uib.no
Organization: student of numerical analysis at the University of Bergen, Norway
References: <1992Nov13.190025.6323@digi.lonestar.org> <1992Nov16.145038.23449@geac.com>
 <1992Nov17.153453.7235@digi.lonestar.org>
 <1992Nov17.193610.14444@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>
Date: 18 Nov 92 20:38:26
Lines: 43