Article View: alt.folklore.science
Article #1168Re: Tapping soft drink cans
From: Philip L. Gravel
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 18:18
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 18:18
46 lines
2685 bytes
2685 bytes
In article <1993Jan20.200301.10512@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, ceubanks@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Charles F Eubanks) writes: > In article <mcampbel.727553725@eola.cs.ucf.edu> mcampbel@cs.ucf.edu (Mike Campbell ) writes: > >judson@watserv.ucr.edu (Mike Judson) writes: > > > >>Does tapping the top of soft drink cans really prevent them from > >>"exploding" when you open them, or is it a UL? > > > >I think this is pure poppycock. [description of experiment deleted] > Try the experiment again, but this time, immediately after shaking, grip the > can firmly and smack the top VERY sharply with your knuckles and open it > right away. > > I beleive you will see a significant reduction in the amount of spewing and > foaming compared to an un-smacked can opened at the same time. One theory > developed during a fast and loose discussion on the subject is that the > can top flexes downward, sending a shock wave (of sorts) through the > excessivly pressurized gas in the can created by bringing CO2 out of > solution by shaking. The shock wave temporarily sends the CO2 back into > solution and thus reducing the total pressure in the gas. > > Inviting all other theories, thoughts, musings, flames..... ;) OK, you asked. I think it is legend, but to the extend that it does work, I don't think it would be because of CO2 going back into solution. The time is probably too short and the surface area for absorption too small. Rather, I would expect that a foam would form on top of the liquid in the yet unopened can after it is shaken. A sharp tap would cause the bubbles to break or coalesce. There would be less liquid surrounding these fewer, but larger bubbles. When the can is opened, the rapidly escaping gas would carry less liquid along with it and thus reduce the spewing. Phil ----- Philip L. Gravel Internet: pgravel@nap.amoco.com Amoco Chemical Company, Chicago, IL Phone: (312)856-3553 ---------- These opinions aren't worth the paper they're written on and certainly don't reflect those of my employer.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan21.181820.3876@nap.amoco.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!srvr1.engin.umich.edu!umeecs!umn.edu!noc.msc.net!uc.msc.edu!apctrc!wsc!vnet74.nap.amoco.com!newsReferences:
<1993Jan20.200301.10512@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.science Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!srvr1.engin.umich.edu!umeecs!umn.edu!noc.msc.net!uc.msc.edu!apctrc!wsc!vnet74.nap.amoco.com!news From: pgravel@nap.amoco.com (Philip L. Gravel) Subject: Re: Tapping soft drink cans Message-ID: <1993Jan21.181820.3876@nap.amoco.com> Sender: news@nap.amoco.com Reply-To: pgravel@nap.amoco.com (Philip L. Gravel) Organization: Amoco Chemical Company References: <1993Jan20.200301.10512@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 18:18:20 GMT Lines: 46