🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1993Jan20.172209.16174@brtph560.bnr.ca>, Dave Filpus <filpus@bnr.ca> writes:
=In article <1jdqjhINNjnf@gap.caltech.edu> Carl J Lydick,
=carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU writes:
=>In article <Jan.15.16.59.52.1993.20617@zeppelin.rutgers.edu>, 
=>trott@zeppelin.rutgers.edu (Rich Trott) writes:
=>=I was wondering if anyone could direct me to what they might consider
=>=the best resources that debunk and the best resources that endorse
=>=creationism.  Specifically (here's the folklore part), I'm looking for
=>=something (on the debunk side) that will not only explain why the
=>=evidence for evolution is overwhelming (I already possess resources to
=do
=>=this) but will also point to specific examples of creationist
=>="evidence" that have been discredited (such as a hoax discovery of
=>=human footprints alongside dinosaur footprints, or something of that
=>=nature).
=>
=>Ask Chris Colby in talk.origins.  Or read Stephen J. Gould's books.
=
=Or look in sci.skeptic.  This thread surfaces occasionally there.

If you have access to the TALK groups, *DON'T* look in sci.skeptic.  Then the
thread shows up there, we mostly wait for Chris (who subscribes to both
TALK.ORIGINS and SCI.SKEPTIC) to post parts of his FAQ from TALK.ORIGINS.  The
thread *REALLY* belongs in TALK.ORIGINS, *NOT* SCI.SKEPTIC.  Thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl J Lydick | INTERnet: CARL@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU | NSI/HEPnet: SOL1::CARL

Disclaimer:  Hey, I understand VAXen and VMS.  That's what I get paid for.  My
understanding of astronomy is purely at the amateur level (or below).  So
unless what I'm saying is directly related to VAX/VMS, don't hold me or my
organization responsible for it.  If it IS related to VAX/VMS, you can try to
hold me responsible for it, but my organization had nothing to do with it.