Article View: alt.folklore.science
Article #1226Re: Scientism? - Creationism v. Evolution
From: JaBrIoL
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 02:07
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 02:07
71 lines
5144 bytes
5144 bytes
Steve Mading <spammersMustDie@real-addr-is-madings-at-bmrb-wisc-edu.invalid> wrote in message news:<c8dstk$nrf$1@news.doit.wisc.edu>... > In talk.atheism JaBrIoL <Jabriol@excite.com> wrote: > : Steve Mading <spammersMustDie@real-addr-is-madings-at-bmrb-wisc-edu.invalid> wrote in message news:<c873do$nrf$1@news.doit.wisc.edu>... > :> In talk.atheism JaBrIoL <Jabriol@excite.com> wrote: > :> : Steve Mading <spammersMustDie@real-addr-is-madings-at-bmrb-wisc-edu.invalid> wrote in message news:<c83ki0$9fn$1@news.doit.wisc.edu>... > :> :> In talk.atheism JaBrIoL <Jabriol@excite.com> wrote: > :> :> : David Jensen <david@dajensen-family.com> wrote in message news:<a028a09g8scea3j0vkv3bnrc0su1fgg68v@4ax.com>... > :> :> :> In alt.talk.creationism, Jabriol@excite.com (JaBrIoL) wrote in > :> :> :> <d222de3e.0405131255.6ad44187@posting.google.com>: > :> :> :> >pdunkel@palebluedot.net (Dunk) wrote in message > :> :> :> > > :> :> :> > > :> :> :> > > :> :> :> >> No it doesn't. Try posting just this part in talk.origins to get an > :> :> :> >> earfull! > :> :> :> >> > :> :> :> >> > :> :> :> >not going to happen, all Jabriol threads are banned in that NG. your > :> :> :> >question will get down to 2 ng's > :> :> :> > :> :> :> As everyone knows, your threads are not banned in talk.origins. > :> :> : > :> :> : really david? > :> :> : > :> :> : do the test, crosspost reply to do this thread to T.O. reduce the > :> :> : crosspost 4 groups, of these 4 groups leave in T.O and > :> :> : sci.anthropology.paleo or ARJW. > :> :> : > :> :> : the jabfilter will only allow 2. cutting off the replies from the > :> :> : other groups who might be on topic. > :> :> > :> :> Do this as any other user and the same exact thing happens. > :> : > :> : All users are affected. they just don't know it. > :> : > :> : if you were to tell the T.O. moderator that Jabriol moved to another > :> : newsgroup. > :> : he would put the 2 rule jabfilter against that group and all of it > :> : users. > :> : > :> : News.Groups agreed that this called "Content Moderation" and > :> : Censorship. > :> > :> You've already been told a zillion times what's actually happening > :> is that all posts that are crossposted are denied automatically > :> in that group. That's not censorship, and you know it, You are > :> lying. > : > : > : wrong again, T.O. has a 4 group crosspost limit by charter. However a > : jabfilter is in place for Jabthreads... this includes ARJW and SAP. > : > : all you have to do is go T.O. and ask DIG. > > In the alternate universe where that was actuallly true, it still > wouldn't amount to content moderation to say, "Here's an ass who keeps > crossposting unrelated groups together to start flamewars, let's > make it so that he can still post any content he feels like so long > as he doesn't crosspost." wrong again. I was on topic 99% of the time, the crosspost was also on topic. what the regular of T.O. found offensive was the material that I posted, and the group where the on topic cross post went. once agin just ask Dig. Besides T.O has it fair share of off topic posts. and remember News.Group AGREED, there was content moderation, and censorship. they claim the moderator can do as he please beyond the charter.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<d222de3e.0405181807.b821a3@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!controlnews3.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<d222de3e.0403291135.69736571@posting.google.com> <kDUjc.2869$TT.1677@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <40a2dc10.2840640@news.east.earthlink.net> <d222de3e.0405131255.6ad44187@posting.google.com> <a028a09g8scea3j0vkv3bnrc0su1fgg68v@4ax.com> <d222de3e.0405140314.d11de32@posting.google.com> <c83ki0$9fn$1@news.doit.wisc.edu> <d222de3e.0405150416.310413af@posting.google.com> <c873do$nrf$1@news.doit.wisc.edu> <d222de3e.0405160732.68e5daa4@posting.google.com> <c8dstk$nrf$1@news.doit.wisc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102cdf,975a546dc07fb449 X-Google-Thread: f69b1,237737f085aeb181 X-Google-Thread: f64bc,86435d04433c39e7 X-Google-Thread: 111000,86435d04433c39e7 X-Google-Thread: 100202,86435d04433c39e7 X-Google-Thread: 119db8,9fe0352bcbfe13a9 X-Google-Thread: 100922,86435d04433c39e7 X-Google-Thread: 10e378,86435d04433c39e7 X-Google-Thread: fd648,318d849b6b1dad7f X-Google-Attributes: gid102cdf,gidf69b1,gidf64bc,gid111000,gid100202,gid119db8,gid100922,gid10e378,gidfd648,public Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!controlnews3.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: Jabriol@excite.com (JaBrIoL) Newsgroups: alt.folklore.science,alt.paranet.science,sci.anthropology.paleo,sci.bio.paleontology,talk.atheism,alt.history.science,alt.religion.jehovahs-witn,alt.talk.creationism,aus.science Subject: Re: Scientism? - Creationism v. Evolution Date: 18 May 2004 19:07:06 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 71 Message-ID: <d222de3e.0405181807.b821a3@posting.google.com> References: <d222de3e.0403291135.69736571@posting.google.com> <kDUjc.2869$TT.1677@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <40a2dc10.2840640@news.east.earthlink.net> <d222de3e.0405131255.6ad44187@posting.google.com> <a028a09g8scea3j0vkv3bnrc0su1fgg68v@4ax.com> <d222de3e.0405140314.d11de32@posting.google.com> <c83ki0$9fn$1@news.doit.wisc.edu> <d222de3e.0405150416.310413af@posting.google.com> <c873do$nrf$1@news.doit.wisc.edu> <d222de3e.0405160732.68e5daa4@posting.google.com> <c8dstk$nrf$1@news.doit.wisc.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.154.80.31 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1084932426 15827 127.0.0.1 (19 May 2004 02:07:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 02:07:06 +0000 (UTC)