🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.folklore.science
Article #1243

Re: Scientism? - Creationism v. Evolution

#1243
From: Hostman Brevis
Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 06:43
65 lines
4240 bytes
"EarlCox" <earlcox@earlcoxreports.com> wrote in message news:<_jclc.52665$6m4.5904436@twister.southeast.rr.com>...
> Some recent articles in Science and Nature show that the great apes, dogs,
> and some birds (such a the African Grey) appear to have a sense of self and
> a sense of self-awareness (hence an ego). Perhaps not as keenly developed as
> ours, but never-the-less, they have an ego.
> 
> Earl

Cool.


> 
> 
> --
> 
> 
> Earl Cox
> Founder and President
> Scianta Intelligence, LLC
> Turn Knowledge Into Intelligence
> www.scianta.com
> 
> 
> AUTHOR:
> "The Fuzzy Systems Handbook" (1994)
> "Fuzzy Logic for Business and Industry" (1995)
> 
> "Beyond Humanity: CyberEvolution and Future Minds"
> (1996, with Greg Paul, Paleontologist/Artist)
> 
> "The Fuzzy Systems Handbook, 2nd Ed." (1998)
> "Machine Intelligence Tools for Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery"
> (due Early Summer 2004)
> 
> 
> 
> "Hostman Brevis" <apocalypse_zero@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:caeecb67.0405021041.2bb465de@posting.google.com...
> > John  Ings <nodamned@spam.org> wrote in message
>  news:<kpr990p0opijnkk00krcu4jjb9t061sj3f@4ax.com>...
> > > On 2 May 2004 02:00:23 -0700, apocalypse_zero@hotmail.com (Hostman
> > > Brevis) wrote:
>  
> > > And egotistical, self-serving arguments usually aren't given much
> > > respect in honest debate.
> >
> > We (humans) are the only beings who have 'ego' (consciousness of our
> > own identity). Creating virtual 'ego' for other animals (as you do) is
> > laughable in any seriously honest discussion and shows you promote
> > your own best interests instead (getting 'equal rights' for e.g.
> > worms) by creating these false associations. That's the truth. Things
> > that are not there, should not be said. Humans have ego's, animals
> > don't. The bottom line is: it is wrong to view from a virtual 'ego'
> > perspective of a worm (e.g.) to see if we humans are a plague or not,
> > or to be superior or not simply because there isn't such a thing as a
> > virtual 'ego' (as you say). I'm as honest and objective as I can be.
> > Evolution happened, the bible is book of tales, animals are inferior
> > and 'God' is irrelevant period.
> >
> >
> > > >There IS no one else, so it doesn't need to be affirmed. We can say
> > > >anything we want.
> > >
> > > With questionable credibility.
> > See above.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <caeecb67.0405022243.7fa4528c@posting.google.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!controlnews3.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
References: <kDUjc.2869$TT.1677@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <tk1590dlmdlc31eup02d7u1g82ri6lmu5e@4ax.com> <caeecb67.0404301512.22ccbd69@posting.google.com> <gf7690pg29bsabi0fct60t2f0ol65qpkkb@4ax.com> <caeecb67.0405011059.6f1d244c@posting.google.com> <9j2890dshgkgrv0qnpenptd3e5dv7ta0nu@4ax.com> <caeecb67.0405020100.dddee0c@posting.google.com> <kpr990p0opijnkk00krcu4jjb9t061sj3f@4ax.com> <caeecb67.0405021041.2bb465de@posting.google.com> <_jclc.52665$6m4.5904436@twister.southeast.rr.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 102cdf,975a546dc07fb449
X-Google-Thread: f69b1,237737f085aeb181
X-Google-Thread: f64bc,86435d04433c39e7
X-Google-Thread: 111000,86435d04433c39e7
X-Google-Thread: 100202,86435d04433c39e7
X-Google-Thread: 119db8,9fe0352bcbfe13a9
X-Google-Thread: 100922,86435d04433c39e7
X-Google-Thread: 10e378,86435d04433c39e7
X-Google-Thread: fd648,318d849b6b1dad7f
X-Google-Attributes: gid102cdf,gidf69b1,gidf64bc,gid111000,gid100202,gid119db8,gid100922,gid10e378,gidfd648,public
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!controlnews3.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: apocalypse_zero@hotmail.com (Hostman Brevis)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.science,alt.paranet.science,sci.anthropology.paleo,sci.bio.paleontology,talk.atheism,alt.history.science,alt.religion.jehovahs-witn,alt.talk.creationism,aus.science
Subject: Re: Scientism? - Creationism v. Evolution
Date: 2 May 2004 23:43:32 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <caeecb67.0405022243.7fa4528c@posting.google.com>
References: <kDUjc.2869$TT.1677@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <tk1590dlmdlc31eup02d7u1g82ri6lmu5e@4ax.com> <caeecb67.0404301512.22ccbd69@posting.google.com> <gf7690pg29bsabi0fct60t2f0ol65qpkkb@4ax.com> <caeecb67.0405011059.6f1d244c@posting.google.com> <9j2890dshgkgrv0qnpenptd3e5dv7ta0nu@4ax.com> <caeecb67.0405020100.dddee0c@posting.google.com> <kpr990p0opijnkk00krcu4jjb9t061sj3f@4ax.com> <caeecb67.0405021041.2bb465de@posting.google.com> <_jclc.52665$6m4.5904436@twister.southeast.rr.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.148.229.204
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1083566612 6847 127.0.0.1 (3 May 2004 06:43:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 06:43:32 +0000 (UTC)