🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.folklore.science
Article #934

Re: Electric Field Question

#934
From: Robin Fairbairns
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 17:29
36 lines
2560 bytes
In article <mcampbel.724947751@eola.cs.ucf.edu>, mcampbel@cs.ucf.edu (Mike Campbell ) writes:
|> rf@cl.cam.ac.uk (that's me, folks) writes:
|> 
|> >No.  Nor yet in Scotland, Wales, or any part of Ireland (to the best
|> >of my knowledge).  Rationale (I've posted this once before, but it
|> >plainly didn't sink in):
|> 
|> >1) We don't get that much sun (we're a good bit further North than the
|> >   (even remotely) heavily-populated parts of N America, and we have
|> >   the gulf stream to contend with, which tends to give us moist
|> >   summers)
|> >2) Our roads tend to be rather narrow, so that people who drive with
|> >   an arm hanging out of the window lose their arm by interaction with
|> >   oncoming traffic rather than through cancer
|> 
|> Oh come on!  Surely the MIRRORS would be hit before the arms...  When we say
|> arms hanging out, we don't mean out parallel to the road!
|>
|> There'd be a LOT of missing mirrors and door handles, (and fenders, and
|> bumpers) is this was even remotely significant.

I have indeed lost a mirror as I drove along a road near my house.
However (as I made clear in my original post), item (2) isn't (shall
we say) quite as _serious_ as item (1).  I do know (at 2nd hand) of
one person who suffered in this way some long time ago.  My father
won't let anyone hang an arm out of the window of a car he's driving
for this reason.

Fwiw, I don't own a car (haven't since the early 70s).  My wife does,
and _its_ mirror would offer very little protection against the
determined disarming car coming in the opposite direction.  (Its door
handles are pretty much flush with the door...)
--
Robin (Campaign for Real Radio 3) Fairbairns       rf@cl.cam.ac.uk
U of Cambridge Computer Lab, Pembroke St, Cambridge  CB2 3QG, UK
"They had twelve years to lay in wait for us" - Bush supporter on Nov 4
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Dec21.172934.10785@infodev.cam.ac.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!bnr.co.uk!uknet!pavo.csi.cam.ac.uk!rf
References: <2DEC199211141705@rosie.uh.edu> <2DEC199216372847@rover.uchicago.edu> <PETER.92Dec3132059@cancun.icad.com> <kjR=tY@engin.umich.edu> <4317@novavax.UUCP> <1992Dec18.111222.29950@prl.dec.com> <1992Dec21.123733.3694@infodev.cam.ac.uk> <mcampbel.724947751@eola

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!bnr.co.uk!uknet!pavo.csi.cam.ac.uk!rf
From: rf@cl.cam.ac.uk (Robin Fairbairns)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.science
Subject: Re: Electric Field Question
Message-ID: <1992Dec21.172934.10785@infodev.cam.ac.uk>
Date: 21 Dec 92 17:29:34 GMT
References: <2DEC199211141705@rosie.uh.edu> <2DEC199216372847@rover.uchicago.edu> <PETER.92Dec3132059@cancun.icad.com> <kjR=tY@engin.umich.edu> <4317@novavax.UUCP> <1992Dec18.111222.29950@prl.dec.com> <1992Dec21.123733.3694@infodev.cam.ac.uk> <mcampbel.724947751@eola
Sender: news@infodev.cam.ac.uk (USENET news)
Organization: U of Cambridge Computer Lab, UK
Lines: 36
Nntp-Posting-Host: lelaps.cl.cam.ac.uk