Article View: alt.folklore.science
Article #981Re: Science vs technology
From: Tero Sand
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 14:19
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 14:19
40 lines
2683 bytes
2683 bytes
In article <1gkmcsINNhuf@emmental.csv.warwick.ac.uk> mapac@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr H M Brown) writes: > > > I'm not certain if this is the correct newsgroup for such a discussion > but I'm interested to hear other peoples views. > About a week ago I was involved in an argument ( lubricated by a little >alchoholic refreshment :-) ) about science and technology, the basic points >discussed were as follows. > I personally consider science to be the search for answers, trying to >discover why things work. This is an ultimately futile attempt since no >matter what answers you arrive at the question why can still be asked. > For example consider Newton's law of gravity, it states that two >objects attract each other in proportion to the product of their masses, and >inversely to their distance apart. Why? Einstien says that this is because they >warp space-time around them, hence they are able to be seen to act upon each >other at a distance. Why do they distort space-time ? and so on and so forth. >Thus while the Newton gives an excellent description of what is occurring it >still leaves a host of questions unanswered. In a sense it focuses the area of >doubt, we know why objects fall to the ground, planets orbit the sun etc IF we >know why there is this force between them. Science is *not* really concerned about "why". It deals more with "how". > Technology on the other hand I consider to be the search for things >that work. i.e. the question why is not the motivating force, tangible results >are what is important here. So for a 'technologist' Newton's gravity is fine >since it gives us the results wanted. i.e. How to navigate to the moon, orbits >for satellites etc. > The question is which should motivate a modern scientist ? Are >getting tangible results all that is necessary ? Are what I consider scientists >actually philosophers ? Maybe, if you think science asks the question "why". Tero Sand -- EMail: cust_ts@cc.helsinki.fi or custts@cc.helsinki.fi "I feel most ministers who claim they've heard God's voice are eating too much pizza before they go to bed at night, and it's really an intestinal disorder, not a revelation." - Reverend Jerry Falwell
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec15.141959.27745@klaava.Helsinki.FI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!enterpoop.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!mcsun!news.funet.fi!hydra!klaava!cust_tsReferences:
<1gkmcsINNhuf@emmental.csv.warwick.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!enterpoop.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!mcsun!news.funet.fi!hydra!klaava!cust_ts From: cust_ts@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Tero Sand) Newsgroups: alt.folklore.science Subject: Re: Science vs technology Message-ID: <1992Dec15.141959.27745@klaava.Helsinki.FI> Date: 15 Dec 92 14:19:59 GMT References: <1gkmcsINNhuf@emmental.csv.warwick.ac.uk> Organization: University of Helsinki Lines: 40