🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: alt.folklore.science
3 messages
3 total messages Started by Steve Crabtree Fri, 18 Dec 1992 20:33
Re: Full moon and tides
#1119
Author: Steve Crabtree
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 20:33
50 lines
2717 bytes
To: alt.folklore.science
From: steve.crabtree@synapse.org

mayor@ee.umanitoba.ca writes:

M(> In article 1gigbeINNk69@gap.caltech.edu, carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU
M(> (Carl J Lydick) writes:

M(> >The moon is not the sole source of tides.  The tidal effects of
M(> >the sun are also significant.  During new and full moons, the
M(> >tidal effects of the sun and the moon reinforce each other.
M(> >Hence higher tides during new and full moons, ceteris paribus.

M(> During the new moon, the moon is on the same side of the earth as
M(> the sun.  During full moon, the moon is on the OPPOSITE side of
M(> earth as the sun. So shouldn't the gravitational tugs oppose each
M(> other during full moon and reinforce each other during the new
M(> moon only?

M(> I think so.  Maybe I'm wrong.  Think about it.

The reason I don't think this is so is that there are two raised
humps of water on the earth's surface, one facing the moon (offset by
effects of the earth's rotation) and one on the opposite side. This
gives the normal two high tides per day (roughly).

When I first thought about this, it gave me some trouble until I
realized that the earth-moon system does not revolve around the
earths centre, but around it's common centre of gravity.

This means that water on the far side of the centre of gravity
experiences a centrifugal pseudo-force which causes it to rise up on
the side facing away from the moon.

Similarly, the earth-sun system revolves around a common centre of
gravity which similarly creates a hump on the far side of the earth in
addition to a hump caused by the differential gravitational force on
the side facing the sun.

Clearly either the "gravitational attraction" humps or the
"centrifugal" humps can add together and therefore the sun and moon
should cause greater tides together when they line up on opposite
sides of the earth or on the same side.

One thing I've never tried to work out is whether the centrifugal hump
and the gravitational hump are the same size, and further, if they
are, whether they have to be or whether it's coincidence. I know from
personal experience (living by the banks of a tidal river) that they
are approximately equal.
                                                                                        
Re: Full moon and tides
#1123
Author: puck
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 04:30
30 lines
1848 bytes
In article <647.1561.uupcb@synapse.org> steve.crabtree@synapse.org (Steve Crabtree)  writes:
>
>One thing I've never tried to work out is whether the centrifugal hump
>and the gravitational hump are the same size, and further, if they
>are, whether they have to be or whether it's coincidence. I know from
>personal experience (living by the banks of a tidal river) that they
>are approximately equal.
>                                                                                        

   The relative strength of the centrifugal hump depends a great
deal on your delclination (latititude).  Since the Earth is spinning
on it's pole, a point on the equator is farther from the center of
spin than a point near a pole.  This causes tides in different areas
to have different effects.

   For example, the tides on the U.S. west coast have two peaks daily.
The difference in height between the two peaks differs from day to
day---sometime the peaks are the same height, sometimes the peaks
have several feet of difference between them.

   Local geography also affects tides greatly.

.k.


-- 
 ``Much of what is greatest in human     |kaydin@jarthur.claremont.edu
 achievement involves some element of    |kaydin@hmcvax.bitnet
 intoxication.''                         |!uunet!muddcs!jarthur!kaydin
                   --Bertrand Russell    |or send mail by W.A.S.T.E.
Re: Full moon and tides
#1101
Author: David Breneman
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 00:36
23 lines
1679 bytes
In article <647.1561.uupcb@synapse.org> steve.crabtree@synapse.org (Steve Crabtree)  writes:
>
>One thing I've never tried to work out is whether the centrifugal hump
>and the gravitational hump are the same size, and further, if they
>are, whether they have to be or whether it's coincidence. I know from
>personal experience (living by the banks of a tidal river) that they
>are approximately equal.
>                                                                                        

Well, living on Puget Sound, I observe that they vary.  Either you
have two relatively moderate high and low tides (ie 8' high, 6' low,
9' high, 5' low) in a 25-hour period, or one extreme and one fairly
moderate tide (ie 12' high, -2' low, 9' high, 7' low) and you transition
between these tide-pairs on a roughly 4-week cycle.  Also, during the
winter you tend to have the extreme high tides during the day; and during
the summer you tend to have the extreme low tides during the day, which
wrecks havoc with boat ramps. :-)

-- 
David Breneman     Sys Admin, Tacoma Screw Products, Inc. |  ____  ____  ____
dcb@tacoma.uucp           |   SCREWIE the TSP CLOWN sez-  |   /   /___  /___/ 
 ..!uunet!tacoma!dcb      | "Zinc & cadmium plating stops |  /   ____/ / 
CompuServe: <DEAD>        |  rust & acts as a lubricant!" |
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads