🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <dschultz.4128.000F0428@ti.com>,
	dschultz@ti.com (Douglas A. Schultz II) writes:
>
> [ very appropriate rage and inappropriate call for censorship snipped ]
> 
> So I gather that censorship of individuals and groups is ok if it suits YOUR 
> agenda, "Intrepid"?  Is that right? You wish to censor these individuals from 
> the Internet and control their rights to access what is essentially a public 
> forum????
> 
> How very ironic, since one of the cornerstones of the Third Reich & Nazi 
> Germany was censorship and control of individuals and information.
> 
> Where does it end?
> 

Perhaps with the formation of a "counter" group, e.g. alt.human.power, 
dedicated to promoting human rights, understanding, and cultural 
pluralism, and to fighting racism, sexism, ethnic and religious hatreds, 
etc.

Fight fire with fire, not censorship.
(and please take this discussion to a more appropriate group -- see
the Followup-to header for a best guess on my part as to what they might be)

jean.
------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Jean Liddle                   | DISCLAIMER:  "My thoughts are my own.
email:  jean@kcco.com         | My employer probably has different
        jean@interaccess.com  | thoughts. Ergo, what I write here are
http://www.kcco.com/~jean/    | my own opinions, not my employer's."
------------------------------+---------------------------------------
PGP Public Key Available on my home page & public key servers worldwide
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When you go out strolling through the world you do not have the "right 
not to be offended" by the values and cultures of other 
peoples/countries/religions.   --internet user, condemning the CDA