Thread View: alt.games.gb
9 messages
9 total messages
Started by Mike Varney
Mon, 25 Jan 1993 16:46
Clarkson Game final standings....
Author: Mike Varney
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 16:46
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 16:46
46 lines
2784 bytes
2784 bytes
Here are the final rankings of the GB 5.2 game run at Clarkson for
the last few months:
----==== PLAYER RANKINGS ====----
## Name Morale Tech IQ
1 M [ 8] GEM 39312 201.21 159
2 [11] Selenes 9528 165.68 180
3 [14] Rakshasa 2972 150.14 195
4 M [ 5] Leviathan 898 112.62 149
5 [ 7] Gun-Roh-Chin -456 109.09 140
6 [ 3] Truzenzuzex -764 110.02 171
7 [15] The Blaine -766 121.60 160
8 [ 4] Seeker -946 126.52 164
9 [13] Vulk -1248 92.14 120
10 [ 9] Masher -1279 91.45 120
11 M [ 6] Killer Gerbils -1515 60.03 138
12 [10] Anacer Union -2004 126.89 160
13 [12] Smileys -3521 114.01 144
14 [ 2] Creepazoids -24633 197.72 186
15 D [ 1] The_Lord(tm) 0 0.00 0
========== Galactic Bloodshed Power Report ==========
rank # Name VP mil civ cash ship pl res fuel dest morl VNs
1 [ 8] GEM 9.0K 22K 9.4M 547K 2.0K332 299K 451K 116K 39K 0
2 [11] Selenes 1.4K 4.3K 1.5M 451K 576 67 24K 51K 9.7K 9.5K 31
3 [14] Rakshasa 382 1.4K 269K 353K 156 16 11K 19K 1.5K 3.0K 0
4 [ 5] Leviathan 1.4K 1.4K 5.3M 605K 492 39 73K 177K 12K 898 0
5 [ 7] Gun-Roh-Chin 177 463 162K 289K 46 4 6.4K10.0K 2.3K -456 0
6 [ 3] Truzenzuzex 202 33 165K 96K 8 14 25K 29K 3.8K -764 0
7 [15] The Blaine 10 0 3.1K 19K 3 2 855 887 6 -766 0
8 [ 4] Seeker 62 43 20K 96K 7 1 943 5.2K 2.1K -946 0
9 [13] Vulk 13 0 29K 5.8K 0 4 760 1.2K 179-1.2K 0
10 [ 9] Masher 14 0 54K 3.1K 2 1 1.1K 1.4K 50-1.3K 0
11 [ 6] Killer Gerbils 163 0 85K 8.6K 16 11 18K 28K 8.5K-1.5K 0
12 [10] Anacer Union 215 0 518K 87K 20 12 29K 35K 4.2K-2.0K 0
13 [12] Smileys 70 0 35K 46K 9 11 7.6K 11K 3.0K-3.5K 0
14 [ 2] Creepazoids 449 2.3K 904K 458K 589 73 116K 218K 47K -25K 0
15 [ 1] The_Lord(tm) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
The game was ended when it was rather obvious that GEM was going to win. :)
I may run another game shortly... stay tuned.
Mike
Re: Clarkson Game final standings....
Author: Jonathan Roy
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 01:05
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 01:05
16 lines
1146 bytes
1146 bytes
Wanted to point a few things out... CReepazoids led the game most of the time, then dropped out... GEM of course killed all our colonies and such without a responce from us. You'll note his 33K morale, and Creep's -27K morale. :) Also, power in that game was still the older, messed up, one that gave massive weight to morale, and little to tech/ships/res, etc. Just had to be said by someone. ;) -- F F Jonathan Roy, of the Free Access Foundation Email: ninja@halcyon.com A Mail faf@halcyon.com for information, or FTP to halcyon.com: /pub/faf/ F F Vorlons, of the Galactic Bloodshed Development Team GEnie: J.ROY18 "Everything that has transpired has done so according to my design." - _RotJ_
Re: Clarkson Game final standings....
Author: Kevin Martin
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 03:38
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 03:38
17 lines
917 bytes
917 bytes
varneyml@wckn.dorm.clarkson.edu (Mike Varney) writes:
>----==== PLAYER RANKINGS ====----
> ## Name Morale Tech IQ
> 1 M [ 8] GEM 39312 201.21 159
> 2 [11] Selenes 9528 165.68 180
> 3 [14] Rakshasa 2972 150.14 195
^^^^^^^^
Hey, this is pretty righteous considering I NEVER logged in!
(I gave the race away, essentially, and credit goes to
jerosen@u.washington.edu, among others perhaps.)
--
Kevin Martin
sigma@ipl.rpi.edu
"I told you I'd shoot, but you didn't believe me! WHY didn't you BELIEVE me?!"
Re: Clarkson Game final standings....
Author: James Rosenbaum
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 00:19
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 00:19
43 lines
3310 bytes
3310 bytes
OK, I think the post on the Clarkson game may be just a tad misleading. By
the end of the game, it was really just a few of us playing around with no
competition whatsoever. Creepazoids was the only race that stood up to GEM
at all. So, when they/he quit, the game just died. GEM proceeded to take over
the universe and waste all of Creep's ships at his leisure. Selenes fought
with Smileys and won in the end. That was about it though, as far as I saw.
I've rearranged the power report so that it is in descending order based on
victory points instead of morale. And astericks are to denote the races
that (to the best of my knowledge) were idle by the end of the game. Hope
this clears things up a bit.
========== Galactic Bloodshed Power Report ==========
rank # Name VP mil civ cash ship pl res fuel dest morl VNs
1 [ 8] GEM 9.0K 22K 9.4M 547K 2.0K332 299K 451K 116K 39K 0
2 [11] Selenes 1.4K 4.3K 1.5M 451K 576 67 24K 51K 9.7K 9.5K 31
4 [ 5] Leviathan 1.4K 1.4K 5.3M 605K 492 39 73K 177K 12K 898 0
14 [ 2] *Creepazoids 449 2.3K 904K 458K 589 73 116K 218K 47K -25K 0
3 [14] Rakshasa 382 1.4K 269K 353K 156 16 11K 19K 1.5K 3.0K 0
12 [10] *Anacer Union 215 0 518K 87K 20 12 29K 35K 4.2K-2.0K 0
6 [ 3] *Truzenzuzex 202 33 165K 96K 8 14 25K 29K 3.8K -764 0
5 [ 7] *Gun-Roh-Chin 177 463 162K 289K 46 4 6.4K10.0K 2.3K -456 0
11 [ 6] *Killer Gerbils 163 0 85K 8.6K 16 11 18K 28K 8.5K-1.5K 0
13 [12] Smileys 70 0 35K 46K 9 11 7.6K 11K 3.0K-3.5K 0
8 [ 4] Seeker 62 43 20K 96K 7 1 943 5.2K 2.1K -946 0
10 [ 9] *Masher 14 0 54K 3.1K 2 1 1.1K 1.4K 50-1.3K 0
9 [13] *Vulk 13 0 29K 5.8K 0 4 760 1.2K 179-1.2K 0
7 [15] *The Blaine 10 0 3.1K 19K 3 2 855 887 6 -766 0
15 [ 1] The_Lord(tm) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-- The rankings above are from the moale based power report.
-- Creep jumps from last place to fourth when its on VP and not morale.
Also. I played Rakshasa in this game, I took it over from Kevin Martin
(sigma). In the morale influenced victory chart, I placed 3rd. That was only
because I got bored towards the end and wasted the capitals of a couple idle
players. On the victory point chart above, I place 5th. Thats not very
impressive considering how many races were idle at the end. So, what I'm
saying guys is that I really sucked it in this one. :-)
--Jim Rosenbaum
KingFish, ruler of Rakshasa (borrowed race name)
Re: Clarkson Game final standings....
Author: Samuli Suomi
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 19:39
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 19:39
55 lines
2791 bytes
2791 bytes
In article <1993Jan26.010542.10777@nwnexus.WA.COM> ninja@halcyon.com (Jonathan Roy) writes: > Wanted to point a few things out... CReepazoids led the game > most of the time, then dropped out... GEM of course killed Don't whine, man! You led the game 'till we get jump tech! You just dropped out after we had brought down about 70 of your 220 or so colonies! And it was GEM who led the game in the very beginning when there was more than just few active races! After that break we had it was damn easy to you to take all those colonies you had 'cause there were only few active races left..... C'mon about 7 stars per player at the beginning, it's damn easy to spread out while being almost one and only active played techie....while us mesos are desperately trying to speed our pods up! :) > all our colonies and such without a responce from us. > You'll note his 33K morale, and Creep's -27K morale. :) Yeah I must admit that most of our morale comes from killing unarmed women and children, but... THAT WAS DAMN GREAT RELAXING EXPERIENCE! > Also, power in that game was still the older, messed up, > one that gave massive weight to morale, and little > to tech/ships/res, etc. So what! > Just had to be said by someone. ;) Yeah like this also..... just to give few hard kicks to your yankee ego! ;) but truly: while active Creepazoids is one of the best races I have seen.... > -- > F F Jonathan Roy, of the Free Access Foundation Email: ninja@halcyon.com > A Mail faf@halcyon.com for information, or FTP to halcyon.com: /pub/faf/ > F F Vorlons, of the Galactic Bloodshed Development Team GEnie: J.ROY18 > "Everything that has transpired has done so according to my design." - _RotJ_ Samuli Suomi aka Empire aka Ender, the gov of GEM... -- SAMULI SUOMI * suomi@otax.tky.hut.fi * tel.+358-0-4553527 * s35327h@taltta.hut.fi * ' BE JMT 11 D 99 * suomi@niksula.cs.hut.fi * TRUE ' 02150 Espoo SF * Samuli.Suomi@hut.fi *
Re: Clarkson Game final standings....
Author: Petri Wessman
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 20:03
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 20:03
21 lines
1670 bytes
1670 bytes
On Tue, 26 Jan 1993 01:05:42 GMT, ninja@halcyon.com (Jonathan Roy) said: Jonathan> Wanted to point a few things out... CReepazoids led the game Jonathan> most of the time, then dropped out... GEM of course killed Jonathan> all our colonies and such without a responce from us. Jonathan> You'll note his 33K morale, and Creep's -27K morale. :) Jonathan> Also, power in that game was still the older, messed up, Jonathan> one that gave massive weight to morale, and little Jonathan> to tech/ships/res, etc. This sounds suspiciously like one of those sports newscasters who are always trying to dig up reasons why their favorite/home team just lost. You know, "we would have won this one for sure if... a) there had been more sunspots b) the tarot deck had been favorable c) half the team hadn't been at home watching Simpsons reruns Come on, if GEM won then he (it?) won. That's that. Better luck next time. //Petri (alias TheCulture)
Re: Clarkson Game final standings....
Author: Kevin Martin
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 21:18
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 21:18
20 lines
1378 bytes
1378 bytes
Petri.Wessman@hut.fi (Petri Wessman) writes: >This sounds suspiciously like one of those sports newscasters who are >always trying to dig up reasons why their favorite/home team just >lost. You know, "we would have won this one for sure if... > a) there had been more sunspots > b) the tarot deck had been favorable > c) half the team hadn't been at home watching Simpsons reruns >Come on, if GEM won then he (it?) won. That's that. Better luck next time. Perhaps you can look at it this way. But what if football were scored according to number of injuries inflicted, or one point for every first down? Wouldn't outcomes (and strategy) be a bit different? Face it. Morale ranking, and even ranking by the current VP formula, suck goose eggs. -- Kevin Martin sigma@ipl.rpi.edu "I told you I'd shoot, but you didn't believe me! WHY didn't you BELIEVE me?!"
Re: Clarkson Game final standings....
Author: Jonathan Roy
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1993 00:30
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1993 00:30
34 lines
1913 bytes
1913 bytes
- And it was GEM who led the game in the very beginning when there was - more than just few active races! Mesos always lead early. They get colonies on other planets, and the morale shoot them ahead a little bit. That is why Vorlons is in the top 3 of NYU. It means nothing. - After that break we had it was damn easy to you to take all those - colonies you had 'cause there were only few active races left..... Considering that Creep had jump ships before anyone else, it's not really because of the number of idle races. Creep is the best player I've ever seen. I just posted because I didn't want anyone to think Creep lost the game that badly. (Last place.) He had jump first, d's first, C's first, B's first. I'm in awe of his skill, and wanted to publicly note that. If you believe otherwise, feel free to. If anything contributed to Creep's desire to quit, it was most likely my inability to spend much time in the game... There was no way a normal with 200+ colonies, with no auto/thresh/popn, can compete with a meso that has many governors. -- F F Jonathan Roy, of the Free Access Foundation Email: ninja@halcyon.com A Mail faf@halcyon.com for information, or FTP to halcyon.com: /pub/faf/ F F Vorlons, of the Galactic Bloodshed Development Team GEnie: J.ROY18 "Everything that has transpired has done so according to my design." - _RotJ_
Re: Clarkson Game final standings....
Author: Roger Lewis
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1993 01:10
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1993 01:10
64 lines
2964 bytes
2964 bytes
Regarding the Clarkson standings....
I appreciate the people who stood up for Creepazoids placing higher.
Now for my opinions.
Creepazoids was not a meso that game. Mesos always win. Therefore
the only question was WHICH meso would win?
GEM was a well designed race, played rather well, and apparently
scrapped their gov center for early resources and didn't get
caught with their pants down. [Newbies, don't try this at home.
Scrapping your @ only gives 250 res, but will cost 913 to rebuild.
And will most likely be built at a lower tech than the tech 100
@ you started with. Scrapping your @ is risky, but if you can do
it without getting pegged, it can be VERY rewarding.]
Creepazoids tried to play without allies since it was a small
15 player game, and had a leader and 1 gov.
GEM had a techie ally, a leader for their race and 4? govs, one of
whom was relatively inactive.
With 7 star systems per player, Creepazoids managed to land 200
colonies, but could not afford the time to do all the civ shuffling
and stuff involved with KEEPING the colonies.
When GEM eventually got to our systems, he merely absorbed our
populations wholesale, and did it without destroying the planet.
We would have to DESTROY a planet to take it back. This is why Mesos
always win.
GEM was well played, well designed, and worked hard on diplomacy and
arm-twisting.
Creepazoids was designed as my *LAST* attempt to play a solo techie.
I wanted to make one last try at a techie that could WIN. My conclusions
are that without a LOT of automation (to order all those ships) mesos are
easier cuz pods are launch and forget. And even if mesos weren't easier,
they still always win due to absorption not damaging a planet.
No problem. If I want the fun of playing a techie again, I'll just know
ahead of time that it isn't a winning race and I'll be some MESO's pet.
In fact, I'll probably be GEM's pet. :) I developed a lot of respect for
GEM's ability in the Clarkson game.
But I still say: my governor (Vorlons) is the hardest working gov in the
universe. Heck, he worked harder on my race than I did.
Anyway, justwanted to add this little bit of revisionism from the history
books of the Creepazoids.
Slugs and Kisses,
-Creepy
--
rlewis@venera.isi.edu I'm the NRA *AND* the ACLU.
"Some people are men, and some people are women. They're made that way
so that they can dance together." -Lucille Ball (as Lucy Ricardo)
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads