🚀 go-pugleaf

TCN <cybertom@spammers.kiss.my.ass.visi.net> wrote:
: : computer sports games.  I like playing the real thing.  If you like
: shooting
: : people, play paintball on a wooded cross-country course.

: Well, I agree with you about QUESS, but thats about as far as it goes.

: Just because someone likes to play quake doesn't mean they are of inferior
: intelligence, as you seem to suggest.  maybe they just enjoy the game. I
: do.  When I come home after a bad day at work, get on the net, blow off a
: few heads and I feel better. It's great stress relief.  As for PC sports
: games, they're OK.  As for paintball, I play that too.  It's great to build
: team skills.

Umm... I never said Quakers are stupid, after all I once played Quake ;)
What we were arguing, is that INTELLIGENCE IS NOT NECESSARY for Quake.
I am not arguing anything about sufficiency.  You can have a smart person
playing Quake and a dumb one too.
And a dumb person who was good at mouseclicking could be a good quake player,
while a dumb person could not be a good chess player.

: As for you, you seem like a very lonely, miserable person who can find
: nothing better to do with his or her time than to spread his or her misery
: to other people.  Maybe if you got something that resembles a life, USENET
: and the world in general would be a happier place for all.

Yesterday I ate dinner with five of my friends.  I had another friend come
over last might.
I helped another one prepare for a LISP quiz.
I am secretary of West Campus Hall Council and attended the meeting yesterday.
I work out with friends in the gym at least 3 times a week.
I do orchestra.
I would most certainly say I have a life.

: Please excuse typos, I'm using a new keyboard with a different layout.

DVORAK?
:  











-- 
I have a marvelous proof for Goldbach's   |  Gary Yngve (gt5402a@prism)
conjecture.  Unfortunately there is not   |  cello player, math nerd -  
enough room in my sig to contain it.      |  what more could you ask for?