🚀 go-pugleaf

Sorry man. That was like rusian for me. Was that the answer to "What is
ToFu"?
Can you explain that as "clearer" or just forget it. I do not have to know
that, do I?

Cecil



"tk" <tk@WINDOZEdigiserv.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:20030825165744.3fc5d3da.tk@WINDOZEdigiserv.net...
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 17:46:14 +0200 in
> <message-id:bidb0f$h6d$03$1@news.t-online.com>
> "Jens Mader" <Jemand@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> > what the heck is ToFu
>
>
> top-post n. v.
>
> [common] To put the original portion of an email or Usenet response
> before the quoted part, as opposed to the more logical sequence of
> quoted portion first with original following.
>
> This term is generally used pejoratively with the implication that the
> offending person is a newbie, a Microsoft addict (Microsoft mail tools
> produce a similar format by default), or a garden-variety idiot.
>
> One major problem with top-posting is that people who do it all too
> frequently quote the entire parent message rather than trimming it down
> to those portions relevent to their reply - this makes threads bulky and
> unnecessarily difficult to read and arouses the righteous ire of
> experienced Internet residents (this style is called "TOFU" for "text
> over, fullquote under, or sometimes "jeopardy-style quoting"). Another
> problem is that top-posters often word their replies on the assumption
> that you just read the previous message, even though their perversity
> has put it further down the page than you have yet read.
>
>
>
> HTH.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>   tk
>
> --
> use strict;my(@t)=(chr(114),chr(115),chr(109),chr(126),chr(121),chr(
> 106),chr(114),chr(115),chr(111), chr(36),chr(112),chr(101),chr(120),
> chr(115),chr(120));foreach(reverse (@t)){print(chr(ord($_)-(1<<2)))}