Article View: alt.hypnosis
Article #65Re: Neuro-Linguistic Programming (FAQ)
From: Alice Wilkman
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 18:29
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 18:29
129 lines
7013 bytes
7013 bytes
In article <1992Dec11.220141.2970@news.Hawaii.Edu> lady@uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (Lee Lady) writes: >In article <10378@vtserf.cc.vt.edu> usdgog@vtserf.cc.vt.edu > (Greg Granger) writes: >>On the other side of the coin, if the NLP people would like to share >>something about the NLP process, PLEASE DO SO. >In my opinion, one of the best ways of getting an idea of what NLP is >about is to send a postcard to NLP Comprehensive, 2897 Valmont Rd, >Boulder, CO 80301 (303) 442-1102 and ask them to send you their catalog >of books and videotapes. Looking through the titles and descriptions >will give you a much more realistic picture of NLP than listening to late >night infomercials. Or just reading usenet. I have on posted similar advice in the past. I still consider it to be a simple way to learn a little more about NLP. And for those completely unfamiliar with NLP, the NLP Comprehensive founders are highly regarded for their pioneering work in NLP training by people in NLP and by those who do not dismiss NLP out of hand. Presumably that is mentioned in the FAQ, which I haven't seen. However, for most people who have access to usenet, another relatively easy option is to go to your library and look to see if there are any of the NLP books in the collection. You may find one or more of the Bandler/Grinder books and you can read about NLP from the original sources for yourself for free. And if specific questions arise, there are a number of people here who may be able to answer them. Or tell you about other people who can. This issue has come up several times lately, I would like to make some clarifications about what you will find in the NLP Comprehensive catalog (I have *no* connection with NLP Comphrehensive, it is meant solely as clarification). Lee Lady has on several occasions implied that NLP is not suitable for "self-improvement" type programs, sometimes in the same posting where he mentions NLP Comprehensive. I understand that because of his training, especially his training in the early 80's with Leslie Cameron-Bandler when NLP was geared mainly toward therapists, he continues to stress its usefulness as techniques for therapy, for therapists working with clients. Without discounting its usefulness in therapeutic situations (of which I have no experience), I and others believe NLP has much broader usefulness and encourage people to read the sources and decide for themselves whether they think it is bogus, a waste of time and money, or if it does have value for them. And to do it with the goal of investigating if it may help them do whatever it is they do now, in better ways, whether that is therapy or anything else. If you find it doesn't sound like something you are interested in, it is very easy to avoid learning any more about it. It is obvious that "live" training can afford experience that home study can't and it seems equally obvious that most people who want to develop an in depth knowledge of NLP will want to get training beyond what is available as home study courses or reading. It is not, in my opinion, an absolute requirement for people who want to begin to explore what NLP has to offer to sign up for live training sessions. I quote briefly from the NLP Comprehensive Catalog as Connirae and Steve Andreas give their view of NLP and their goal. "Traditional models of management and psychology are no longer enough. What's unique about NLP is that it enables us to go beyond good intentions; it melds competence, compassion, and flexibility to provide us with practical means to make changes we want for ourselves, and to make a contributions toward improving the condition of the human spirit, and ultimately the world." In addition to what could be considered the basic books of NLP and a number of video and audio tapes aimed at people with pior NLP training, they offer at least 3 programs that are intended specifically for home use by people untrained in NLP techniques. The first is a "The Neuro-Linguistic Programming Home Study Guide" a video and book developed by David Gordon, Leslie Cameron-Bandler and Michael Lebeau. Of which the catalog states, "Gain a level of understanding that goes beyond a one-time seminar experience." They also offer two 6-tape series that are produced by Nightingale-Conant (and also marketed by N-C by direct mail). Both of these series are done by NLP Comprehensive trainers (Charles Faulkner is a prime developer of both and other NLP trainers also participate) and both are unmistakably intended to be used to assist "self improvement" at home. Again from the catalog, "These tapes guide you through making changes using proven NLP techniques... You will be able to use the patterns on these tapes again and again to change different areas of your life" Of the second set "You will learn to get the most enjoyment out of your daily life..." People who want to dismiss NLP on the basis of their own experience, on no experience, or the experience of others are free to do so. People who think it may be interesting to them will have to do a little work on their own to investigate. I think it is important to have a balanced picture of what is being offered by some well known NLP Trainers and what they themselves are saying about the material they offer. >You can do this without worrying that your mailbox will start being >flooded by junk mail. However if this is a real concern, simply state on >your postcard "Please do not add me to your mailing list." If my experience is typical, NLP Comprehensive, does in fact make their mailing list available to others, but not widely. Like other mail order concerns, however, if you tell them not to give out your name, I feel confident they will comply with your request. In addition, NLP Comprehensive placed in their catalog this year a postage-paid post card with the request to return it to them if you no longer wanted to receive their mailings. I get hundreds of catalogs, this is something I had never seen before and I think it is quite commendable and hope it becomes the industry standard. (Just my opinion.) Alice Wilkman
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec13.182903.6826@samba.oit.unc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!newsflash.concordia.ca!sifon!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!enterpoop.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!agate!stanford.edu!rock!concert!samba!wilkmanReferences:
<1992Dec11.144200.297@dxcern.cern.ch> <10378@vtserf.cc.vt.edu> <1992Dec11.220141.2970@news.Hawaii.Edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: alt.hypnosis Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!newsflash.concordia.ca!sifon!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!enterpoop.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!agate!stanford.edu!rock!concert!samba!wilkman From: wilkman@med.unc.edu (Alice Wilkman) Subject: Re: Neuro-Linguistic Programming (FAQ) Message-ID: <1992Dec13.182903.6826@samba.oit.unc.edu> Keywords: NLP NeuroLinguistic Programming Sender: usenet@samba.oit.unc.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: cahaba.med.unc.edu Organization: UNC-CH School of Medicine References: <1992Dec11.144200.297@dxcern.cern.ch> <10378@vtserf.cc.vt.edu> <1992Dec11.220141.2970@news.Hawaii.Edu> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 18:29:03 GMT Lines: 129