🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Dec12.173351.19050@netcom.com> friday@netcom.com (Carol Anne Ogdin) writes:

>Did he train a successor, George?  Is there anyone else who now
>continues his methods?

He was a consultant to the Georgetown University Medical School. He had
a few disciples floating around after his death from old age, but I no
longer recall their names.



>Can you give us any more details on the procedures he used?  Do
>you have any further information about the specific *ways* he got
>the group to visualize the appropriate images?  Were there other
>post-hypnotic suggestions he made that might've been powerful
>interventions, too?
>
Sixteen years have past, so I remember very little. I did purchase
several of his cassettes, which I still own, and I can tell you that
listening to an audio cassette is not as effective as being there in
person. The personal interaction is important. 



>If the individual's needs and wants are unique from the other members
>of the group, how would group hypnosis work?  And, I'm wondering,
>did Mr. Michaluk observe you (along with 29 others), or did he
>only have a specific pattern of induction he used, irrespective
>of the group?

My eyes were closed most of the time. I knew he was observing me,
though, because I heard his voice move to different areas of the
room, so nobody felt isolated.
B
A
>In other words, I wonder if he could've done the
>same thing with a drapery hanging between him and the group of
>subjects?

I doubt it. The relation was one of leader and follower, or teacher and
student. Had there been a physical barrior, the influence would have
been reduced to that of a pre-recorded cassette tape.