🚀 go-pugleaf

In <1gdhmpINN8sr@cat.cis.Brown.EDU> SL500000@brownvm.brown.edu (Robert Mathiesen) writes:
>If you form an ALT.NLP I will probably subscribe, and I might well drop ALT.
>HYPNOSIS.  So far as I can see, since I've been reading it, there are only
>two people who have anything solid to say about hypnosis, and Friday is one
>of them.  Postings specifically about hypnosis seem to have been relatively
>rare since I started reading, and I would guess that about 60%-80% of them
>have verged on the mindless.

One might infer that anyone else who might have posted here has been
driven away by the interminable discussion/flamewar over NLP.

Not necessarily a good basis for assuming that alt.hypnosis would be void
if the strong NLP supporters were shuffled off to another newsgroup.
-- 
Pete Hartman		       Bradley University	pwh@bradley.bradley.edu
         So the odds against him were higher than a vanload of hippies
                   on a blotterful of Owlsley's Old Original.
                           There was still a chance.