Article View: alt.internet.access
Article #101Re: Child Safety Issue, continued...
From: Darnell
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 00:00
68 lines
3665 bytes
3665 bytes
Please stop cross-posting to chi.internet.... liberator wrote in message <7vfe48$6l1$1@Nntp1.mcs.net>... >liberator.net wrote: >>You are not responding to the points, as usual. Who monitors the sysops? >Why aren't the sysops required to get screened? Is the public aware that >CompuServe allows TOTAL STRANGERS to safeguard their children? CompuServe >dropped the ball on this one.< > >Dave responded: ><<At least all CS sysops are *accountable* with names and addresses >available to CS.>> > >But if CompuServe doesn't run a background check on these people and their >names to even verify the identities, these people who "safeguard" youngsters >can easily be childmolestors. Recording fake names is absolutely no measure >for protecting CompuServe children. Admit it. > >My point is that there is no area on the Internet that is more safe than any >other, as far as protecting children goes. This is a no-brainer Dave. >CompuServe can pretend all it likes but it isn't anymore family orientated >than any other service. Admit it. > >Liberator wrote: >>Usually, volunteers are not allowed to perform critical/sensitive >functions. However, CompuServe lets STRANGERS monitor children. That's a >BIG problem.< > >Dave responds: ><<All moderated newsgroups (whioch you seem to claim are as good as CS >forums) rely on *volunteers.* Period. No one is in charge over them.>> > >That's my point Dave; CompuServe isn't providing better child-safety >measures, although it creates the ILLUSION that it does. > ><<There have been zero cases where a CS sysop in any of my areas has been a >problem at all...>> > >CompuServe, owned by AOL, has deep pockets. Can you say, 'out-of-court >settlements'? > ><<They are not "STRANGERS" ...>> > >These STRANGERS provide personal information. Is the information checked by >CompuServe? > ><<This has absolutely nothing to do with your claim that, as a sysop, I must >have a CompuServe "supervisor.">> > >Dave, volunteers who provide critical services, such as handle child-safety >measures, need to be screened by CompuServe and be supervised, else these >STRANGERS can be doing who knows what with children on the Internet! >CompuServe dropped the ball on another issue. > >-- >The Liberator >E-Mail: news@liberator.net >Web Site: http://www.liberator.net/ > >Need a reliable and inexpensive Internet provider? >Visit CNET: http://webisplist.internetlist.com/ > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<RyjT3.83$c75.1440@client>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<7vfe48$6l1$1@Nntp1.mcs.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1056b0,e142c8583bddc40b X-Google-Attributes: gid1056b0,public X-Google-Thread: 1125c1,e142c8583bddc40b X-Google-Attributes: gid1125c1,public X-Google-Thread: 10a922,e142c8583bddc40b X-Google-Attributes: gid10a922,public X-Google-Thread: 10fad5,e142c8583bddc40b X-Google-Attributes: gid10fad5,public X-Google-Thread: 10bb12,e142c8583bddc40b X-Google-Attributes: gid10bb12,public X-Google-Thread: fb39a,e142c8583bddc40b X-Google-Attributes: gidfb39a,public X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,e142c8583bddc40b X-Google-Attributes: gid10d5fa,public From: "Darnell" <No_Reply@Needed.com> Subject: Re: Child Safety Issue, continued... Date: 1999/11/01 Message-ID: <RyjT3.83$c75.1440@client> X-Deja-AN: 543143349 References: <7vfe48$6l1$1@Nntp1.mcs.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Trace: client 941475121 38.158.136.102 (Mon, 01 Nov 1999 11:52:01 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 11:52:01 EST Newsgroups: alt.internet.access,alt.internet.access,alt.internet,alt.online-service.compuserve,alt.online-service.america-online,alt.compuserve-sucks,alt.aol-sucks,chi.internet,alt.CompuFraud