Article View: alt.internet.access
Article #67Strange call from 'Commonwealth Communication Specialists'
From: David Richards
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 1997 00:00
60 lines
3709 bytes
3709 bytes
(Note followup-To:) I responded (on my own time&hardware) by e-mail, to this crosspost entitled 'Ten dollar CASH rebate on all Internet Dialup Accounts', cc'd to postmasters and owners of the related hosts. My message stated that 'chi.internet' does not tolerate commercial ads, spammed or individual, and thus asked that this message be canceled. Standard stuff... no threats, no swearing, no claiming any authority or standing with any company, newsgroup, government, or other 'power trip'. Shortly afterwards (midnight) my ISP took a message for me from 'Matt Roth', stating that due to my e-mail their access was severely curtailed, and that they (Commonwealth Communication) and their provider wish to speak to me as soon as possible (huh?). Ripco was given the impression that I had stated that I was the 'moderator' of chi.internet or had some power over posts to the group or usenet in general. I had no intention of giving such an impression. The chi.* charter (found at http://www.enteract.com/chi_charter.html) specifically states: It should be pointed out that none of the chi newsgroups sanction postings of a commerical nature. This means that if the subject you're posting on is an offer for products or services from which you derive (or attempt to derive) a livelyhood from then it's prohibited in the chi newsgroups. There is some latitude in the case you are responding to a specific request for a product or service as long as the posting is to the point. (Yes, we know that chi.jobs has largely become the headhunters playground.) If you see a posting you belive to be commerical in nature, do not post a followup article to it. The proper response is to email your comments to the offending poster. We highly recommend doing so! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I normally wouldn't have posted a followup article to it, but Ripco does not like getting phone calls complaining about e-mail I have sent (not that calls about _me_ are common or anything :-), and I don't like getting messages in the middle of the night saying that somebody I complained about is now complaining about _me_. FYI, the official charter for chi.internet is as follows: chi.internet For the purpose of providing a platform for all users to discuss the pros and cons of their ISP services. The function of this newsgroup serving in similiar capacity to chi.eats and is meant to be totally non-commercial. (Created 06/16/95 by Charles Cook)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5s3p8a$nse$1@gail.ripco.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f4554,40450310be67fcba,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf4554,public X-Google-Thread: fa874,40450310be67fcba,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public X-Google-Thread: 10bb12,40450310be67fcba,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10bb12,public X-Google-Thread: 1160de,40450310be67fcba,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1160de,public X-Google-Thread: 100579,40450310be67fcba,start X-Google-Attributes: gid100579,public X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,40450310be67fcba,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10d5fa,public X-Google-Thread: fc7b2,40450310be67fcba,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfc7b2,public X-Google-Thread: 10bd82,40450310be67fcba,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10bd82,public From: dr@ripco.com (David Richards) Subject: Strange call from 'Commonwealth Communication Specialists' Date: 1997/08/04 Message-ID: <5s3p8a$nse$1@gail.ripco.com> X-Deja-AN: 262153136 Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet Organization: Ripco Communications Inc. Newsgroups: alt.internet.access,alt.internet.services,chi.internet,ba.internet,dfw.internet.providers,houston.internet.providers,phl.internet,news.admin.net-abuse.usenet