Article View: alt.internet.access
Article #86Re: The Future Cost of Internet Access
From: Ron Baptiste
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 00:00
52 lines
2888 bytes
2888 bytes
Joegivens@mail.prostar.com (Joe Givens) wrote: >suit brought against them regarding the inability of it's users to >gain access. The blame was pointed to their recent decision to provide >unlimited access for a fixed fee and the onslaught of new users coming >aboard and many users logging on and staying on, whether they are >using the system or not. She has predicted that the unlimited use, >fixed fee concept will come to an end. Many providers will go back to >a per hour charge, with some even charging a per site fee. >Now I want to know from you, if this happens, how will it affect your >internet usage? Will you stop using the internet for whatever purpose >you do? Will your usage even change? Do you agree or disagree that >unlimited access is coming to an end? yes >Do you feel it should and we all should pay a per hour fee? yes >Do you feel providers should "bump off" >users that are logged on after a certain amount of time of inactivity? yes >Maybe even have their accounts terminated after a certain amount of >"bump offs" after fair warning? No - they're paying for it; just keep bumping... >I am very interested in your comments and am SORRY for the amount of >cross-posting of this. I just wanted to hear comments from around the >net. No problem. As a Telecom tech, I have some idea what kind of hardware is necessary to provide this kind of unlimited usage, and we simply do not have it in place; nor will we in the foreseeable future. To keep the internet free requires investment from avid users/providers, comensurate with their degree of involvement - as opposed to the government or Microsoft footing the bill, and taking control of what we're allowed to access. Naturally funds are limited, and users in the end must pay a reasonable price for services. It would help delay the demise of unlimited service if users were a little more responsible about using their access as required, not leaving a connection up indefinitely. I for one will not be impacted whatever; I pay 9.95/mo CDN for 5.5 hours, and never have time to use it all up as it is. I mostly interact offline, using email and newsgroup reader (Free Agent), and only use Netscape occasionally.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5c1r61$3h4@eeyore.planet.eon.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<32e0cc8b.0@news.prostar.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,8a43957af5eb6584 X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-Thread: 10bb12,8a43957af5eb6584 X-Google-Attributes: gid10bb12,public X-Google-Thread: 1042ac,91d7deec3925eeca,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1042ac,public From: roba@planet.eon.net (Ron Baptiste) Subject: Re: The Future Cost of Internet Access Date: 1997/01/21 Message-ID: <5c1r61$3h4@eeyore.planet.eon.net> X-Deja-AN: 211321385 references: <32e0cc8b.0@news.prostar.com> organization: Public Live Access Network (PLAnet) newsgroups: alt.internet.access,ca.general,soc.culture.usa