🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.internet.access
Article #86

Re: The Future Cost of Internet Access

#86
From: Ron Baptiste
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 00:00
52 lines
2888 bytes
Joegivens@mail.prostar.com (Joe Givens) wrote:

>suit brought against them regarding the inability of it's users to
>gain access. The blame was pointed to their recent decision to provide
>unlimited access for a fixed fee and the onslaught of new users coming
>aboard and many users logging on and staying on, whether they are
>using the system or not. She has predicted that the unlimited use,
>fixed fee concept will come to an end. Many providers will go back to
>a per hour charge, with some even charging a per site fee.

>Now I want to know from you, if this happens, how will it affect your
>internet usage? Will you stop using the internet for whatever purpose
>you do? Will your usage even change?  Do you agree or disagree that
>unlimited access is coming to an end? 

yes

>Do you feel it should and we all should pay a per hour fee? 

yes

>Do you feel providers should "bump off"
>users that are logged on after a certain amount of time of inactivity?

yes

>Maybe even have their accounts terminated after a certain amount of
>"bump offs" after fair warning? 

No - they're paying for it;  just keep bumping...

>I am very interested in your comments and am SORRY for the amount of
>cross-posting of this. I just wanted to hear comments from around the
>net.

No problem.  As a Telecom tech, I have some idea what kind of hardware
is necessary to provide this kind of unlimited usage, and we simply do
not have it in place;  nor will we in the foreseeable future.  To keep
the internet free requires investment from avid users/providers,
comensurate with their degree of involvement - as opposed to the
government or Microsoft footing the bill, and taking control of what
we're allowed to access.  Naturally funds are limited, and users in
the end must pay a reasonable price for services.  It would help delay
the demise of unlimited service if users were a little more
responsible about using their access as required, not leaving a
connection up indefinitely.

I for one will not be impacted whatever;  I pay 9.95/mo CDN for 5.5
hours, and never have time to use it all up as it is.  I mostly
interact offline, using email and newsgroup reader (Free Agent), and
only use Netscape occasionally.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <5c1r61$3h4@eeyore.planet.eon.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <32e0cc8b.0@news.prostar.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,8a43957af5eb6584
X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public
X-Google-Thread: 10bb12,8a43957af5eb6584
X-Google-Attributes: gid10bb12,public
X-Google-Thread: 1042ac,91d7deec3925eeca,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1042ac,public
From: roba@planet.eon.net (Ron Baptiste)
Subject: Re: The Future Cost of Internet Access
Date: 1997/01/21
Message-ID: <5c1r61$3h4@eeyore.planet.eon.net>
X-Deja-AN: 211321385
references: <32e0cc8b.0@news.prostar.com>
organization: Public Live Access Network (PLAnet)
newsgroups: alt.internet.access,ca.general,soc.culture.usa