Article View: alt.internet.media-coverage
Article #11Re: Merc: PacBell predicts imminent death of the net; film at 11
From: Eric Edwards
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 1996 00:00
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 1996 00:00
56 lines
2890 bytes
2890 bytes
In article <32765332.1E45@pacbell.net>, Black Lodge Engineering writes: > Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > > PacBell is basically just being greedy little asses. They know damn > > well that what people want is to simply be 'connected'. Those people > > are not necessarily *using* the bandwidth all that time, but PacBell > > Then those people should turn off their watchdog timers that ping just > to keep > connections up. People use watchdog timers becuase they need to stay connected, not becuase they need the bandwidth. Ever try to establish a connection to a dial up connected machine that isn't dialed up? It doesn't work. > > > refuses to provide any kind of out-of-band packet service via ISDN that > > would lead to, easily, a 10x savings in bandwidth, and could be sold > > at the same price current unmetered residential service is sold at or > > cheaper. > > You're talking about 0B+D? How many Internet users would go for 16kbps, > 9.6kbps > of which is useful for user data? 0B+D is for another market entirely. By itself, yes. But, when combined with demand dial on the B channels it becomes much more usefull. Given the saturation level of the backbones, 16kbps is fine providing that B channels could be brought up as needed. If Pac Bell really wants to reduce the number of people keeping B channels nailed up they will offer: 1) Low or Zero call setup charge. No economic incentive to make timeouts long. 2) 0B+D. The B channels can be brough up as needed. Only the packet service need be alive to receive connections. 3) No flat rate on the B channels. Yeah, this is unpopular. But the idea is to keep users off the B channels. 4) Drop the surchange for ISDN. (To get internet users off of flat rate POTS service) Users get the illusion of a full time connection. Pac Bell gets people off of flat rate POTS and away from nailed up connections. Of course, Pac Bell isn't going do this because they're not really intestested in solving the problem. They just want to maximize their monopoly profits for as long as they have them. ---- "..very sad life. Probably have very sad death. But there's symetry" Remember the home hobbyist computer: Born 1975, died April 29, 1994
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MTQtz*E85@wolf359.exile.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<Pine.GUL.3.95.961024202749.24299C-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 105b42,70f9b9e629946fc2 X-Google-Attributes: gid105b42,public X-Google-Thread: fa874,70f9b9e629946fc2 X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public From: eric@wolf359.exile.org (Eric Edwards) Subject: Re: Merc: PacBell predicts imminent death of the net; film at 11 Date: 1996/11/09 Message-ID: <MTQtz*E85@wolf359.exile.org> X-Deja-AN: 195487373 references: <Pine.GUL.3.95.961024202749.24299C-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU> organization: Engineers in Exile newsgroups: alt.internet.media-coverage,ba.internet