Article View: alt.internet.services
Article #4555Re: ... continued
From: RSJ
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 1998 00:00
239 lines
8146 bytes
8146 bytes
That's cute, it really is. It is not accurate though and since I state that is not accurate and that my name is being used in something that I publicly state is inaccurate, I would ask that you remove my name from the 'work' that you intend to publish, out of context, on your website. Why not substitute John Doe or whomever? Rsj J-Mag wrote in message <6fhmni$8ub$1@news.hal-pc.org>... > >I'm tired of reading, so I'm wrapping this up. It's currently untitled >(to the tune of "Clementine" (or "Ode to Joy" -- they scan to each other) > >In a message in this newsgroup >Ross St. John had this to say >> Help me find a new provider >> Cuz I need one right away > > When we asked him > >> What's your hurry? > When we asked him > >> What's your rush? > > Texas.net sent me an e-mail > > Saying I'm online too much > >Said the folks who post here often >>> Next time read the AUP >>> No one gets full-time connections >>> When they pay the dial-up fee > > > If you need a good provider > > Stay away from Texas.Net > > They just kicked me off their service > > After mailing me a threat > >>> Will you share that e-mail message >>> Will you post that vile threat >>> We're all wondering about it >> I'm not going to post it yet > > > If you need a good provider > > Texas.net is run by kids > > If they had been more mature > > They would not have done what they did > >>> Could it be there was no message? >>> Could it be there was no threat? >>> How can we believe your charges? >> I'm not going to post it yet > > > Texas.net's just one provider > > Staffed by kids and know-it-alls > > Y'all are circling your wagons > > It's a ISP cabal! > >>> If you want us to believe you >>> You should post some evidence >> I'm not trying my case in Usenet >> Even I have that much sense > > > If Texas.net was your provider > > Tell me how they treated you > > Post it here or send me e-mail > > I'll keep it between me & you > >>> Spamming, too, is theft of service >Up jumps Star, anon'mously >| > But this is just a free speech issue >[the rest is snipped for brevity] > > > If Texas.net was your provider > > Share your view of them with me > > Post it here or send me e-mail > > I'll keep it confidentially > >Then a lost soul in the darkness >Makes his peace with Texas.net >Ross St.John just *has* to question >> Tell me, Chris, what did you get? > > > If Texas.net was your provider > > And you dissed them for so long > > Surely Jonah gave you *something* > > Why else would you change your song? > >: > Adults can reach a resolution >: > Even when the rift is deep >: > We both agreed that none were blameless >: > Now I'm off in search of sleep > > > If Texas.net was your provider > > Why the sudden change of heart > > They gave you *some* "consideration" > > Why else would you take their part > >: > After all his public whining >: > Of the "mail" for Texas.net >: > Ross St. John sent me a message >: > And that e-mail contains a threat > > > Texas.net's a bad provider > > I'm not going to play your game > > You're just trying to change the subject > > With your bogus e-mail claim > >>> We asked Ross to post his e-mail >>> And we'd like the same from you >: > I'm not publishing the message >: > Till the author tells me to > > > If you want a good provider > > Then Texas.net is not for you > > I didn't write a threatening e-mail > > I won't play this game with you > >| > Chris remember your own words now, >| > What you'd do if you were he... >| > You don't need to get permission >> I didn't write that mail, you see > > > Chris I know that you are lying > > Just like those at Texas.net > > I bet you made up the e-mail > > I would never send a threat > >-> Could it be you both are honest? >-> Could Chris recieve an e-mail threat >-> From a Ross St. John imposter >-> (*not* someone at Texas.net) > > > It would not at all surprise me > > If someone at Texas.net > > Wanted to get me in trouble > > By sending Chris an e-mail threat > >: > I've consulted an attorney >: > And I'm taking his advice >: > He said not to post the message >[posted and cross-posted twice] > > > I demand you post the message > > (Knowing you, you won't, I bet) > > We know all about your game now > > And you're just like Texas.net > >| > I can tell you are a coward >| > Post the message like a man >: > You and Ross are the same person >| > You can't prove it > : > Yes I can > > > Star, you're right, he is a coward > > He won't post his bogus "threat" > > He just dug himself in deeper > > Like those kids at Texas.net > >: > Haha, you're wrong, someone at Flash.net >: > Asked to see your note to me >: > And I'm sure that he will see it >>> Post it here for all to see > > > I just called the guys at Flash.net > > No one sent e-mail to you > > Like Texas.net you are a liar > > (and you think *I* need a clue!) > >| > Why send the message off to Flash.net? >| > Post it in the public eye >: > I didn't say that I would send it >: > Learn to read first *then* reply > > > If you send the mail to Flash.net > > Also, you must send to me > > Just like Texas.net, you're trying > > Publicly to libel me > >: > Here's the message sent from Flash.net >: > bigtex wants it sent to him >: > Just in case you missed it last time >[cut and pasted thrice again] > > > You say you think I am Star Trav'ler > > You hear voices, too, I bet > > You're just trying to change the focus > > From the kids at Texas.net > >: > Star's real name is David Hindman >: > And he lives in Oregon >| > That guy sure is interesting >| > If you think he's me, you're wrong > > > Chris could not have wrote that message > > It's too-well written, don't forget > > Chris makes errors in his spelling > > That post came from Texas.net > >| > That man whose bio you just posted >| > Needs to know your tales of him >| > It could hurt future employment >| > And feelings of his next-of-kin > > : > Ross and Star are the same person > : > I've posted so you all can see > > Texas.net kids wrote that message > > It's written too grammatically > >And so the thread appears unending >> Post the message > | > He's not me >: > You've already seen my answer >>> Give us back our h.i.p!!! > > > Texas.net's the instigator > > It's all their fault, don't blame me > > That's why those liars tried to frame me > > They're a lousy ISP!!! > >-------------------------------------------- >If you think I missed something you consider important, feel free to >submit a verse or two (with the correct attributions) and I'll consider >including them. > >This will be appearing on my personal website, too (I've finally figured >out a reason to *have* a personal website). >http://www.brokersys.com/~j-mag/skald.txt > >-- >- J-Mag Guthrie > >/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ >\ Support the strong, || Information Broker Systems / >/ encourage the timid, || 12703 Veterans Memorial, #106 \ >\ remind the indifferent, and || Houston, TX 77014 / >/ warn the opposed. || +1-281-895-8101 (voice) \ >\ -Whitney M. Young || +1-281-895-8109 (fax) / >/ || http://www.brokersys.com/ \ >\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<y1_S.277$Dq4.267541@news.internetMCI.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<6fhmni$8ub$1@news.hal-pc.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 100579,50b44baae255ab44 X-Google-Attributes: gid100579,public X-Google-Thread: fc7b2,50b44baae255ab44 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc7b2,public X-Google-Thread: 10bd82,50b44baae255ab44 X-Google-Attributes: gid10bd82,public From: "RSJ" <rfst.john@mci2000.com> Subject: Re: ... continued Date: 1998/03/28 Message-ID: <y1_S.277$Dq4.267541@news.internetMCI.com> X-Deja-AN: 338471705 References: <6fhmni$8ub$1@news.hal-pc.org> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 22:22:06 EST X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Newsgroups: alt.internet.services,dfw.internet.providers,houston.internet.providers