Article View: alt.internet.services
Article #4682Re: MCI Sucks: BEWARE!!!
From: Bill Elswick
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 00:00
28 lines
2904 bytes
2904 bytes
Wait 'till you're actually *on* the MCI backbone and try to connect to another backbone... The packet loss rates will vary between 25% and 90%, and the ones that *do* get through will take forever... mtenney@megalink.net (Mark) wrote: >OK..here's my opinion of my MCI experience so far: >I have ONE positive experience. That is the actual meeting with our >account rep up here, and the related arrangements for a 45 day turn >up. After that EVERYTHING has been a fiasco. I found out that >information he provided us about MCI's reliability was patently >UNTRUE, MCI's connections are LESS reliable than Sprints as far as >outages, etc. go. MCI's bandwidth is essentially the same as Sprints >and the other backbone carriers. Our salesperson stated that MCI has >by FAR the largest bandwidth on the Internet and that they indeed >carry 40%+ of all Internet traffic. The new information I've been >reading states that MCI is currently upgrading from 45mbps to 166mbps. >Well buly for them! The still only have 45mbps bandwidth, so they >misinformed us. <snip> /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Bill Elswick Digital Audio - Video - Film Entertainment Technology Associates, Inc. Incline Village, Santa Monica, Oldham (UK) Real Time | Embedded | Human belswick@entertech.com Design | Systems | I/O \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ http://www.entertech.com/eta \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4kjf47$n4k@marina.cinenet.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3137658D.35E5@valleynet.com> <4hdu5g$ma4@SNFC21_SRVR_WWW.PBI.net> <4hl33u$mmf@tabloid.amoco.com> <4icaio$mjh@news1.sympatico.ca> <31577E7F.7E80@tcd.net> <4k3i91$k5d@news.megalink.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f9628,92c42a8507ea1486 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9628,public X-Google-Thread: 12ec63,92c42a8507ea1486 X-Google-Attributes: gid12ec63,public X-Google-Thread: 10f21d,92c42a8507ea1486 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f21d,public X-Google-Thread: fc7b2,92c42a8507ea1486 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc7b2,public X-Google-Thread: 10bd82,92c42a8507ea1486 X-Google-Attributes: gid10bd82,public X-Google-Thread: ffd79,92c42a8507ea1486 X-Google-Attributes: gidffd79,public X-Google-Thread: 105c4d,92c42a8507ea1486 X-Google-Attributes: gid105c4d,public X-Google-Thread: 1550f9,92c42a8507ea1486 X-Google-Attributes: gid1550f9,public From: belswick@entertech.com (Bill Elswick) Subject: Re: MCI Sucks: BEWARE!!! Date: 1996/04/11 Message-ID: <4kjf47$n4k@marina.cinenet.net> X-Deja-AN: 146950119 references: <3137658D.35E5@valleynet.com> <4hdu5g$ma4@SNFC21_SRVR_WWW.PBI.net> <4hl33u$mmf@tabloid.amoco.com> <4icaio$mjh@news1.sympatico.ca> <31577E7F.7E80@tcd.net> <4k3i91$k5d@news.megalink.net> organization: ETA Inc. reply-to: belswick@entertech.com newsgroups: alt.internet.services,houston.internet.providers,ne.internet.services,sacramento.internet,necus.internet.news,necus.internet.announce,necus.internet.commerce,misc.news.internet.discuss,alt.internet.access,backbone.general,comp.dcom.telecom.tech,comp.dcom.frame-relay,di.internet