Article View: alt.internet.services
Article #4692Re: MCI Sucks: BEWARE!!!
From: Mark
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 1996 00:00
60 lines
4037 bytes
4037 bytes
OK..here's my opinion of my MCI experience so far: I have ONE positive experience. That is the actual meeting with our account rep up here, and the related arrangements for a 45 day turn up. After that EVERYTHING has been a fiasco. I found out that information he provided us about MCI's reliability was patently UNTRUE, MCI's connections are LESS reliable than Sprints as far as outages, etc. go. MCI's bandwidth is essentially the same as Sprints and the other backbone carriers. Our salesperson stated that MCI has by FAR the largest bandwidth on the Internet and that they indeed carry 40%+ of all Internet traffic. The new information I've been reading states that MCI is currently upgrading from 45mbps to 166mbps. Well buly for them! The still only have 45mbps bandwidth, so they misinformed us. As for our turnup: Originally scheduled for the 15th of February. This got turned back to February 29th, THEN on February 28th they finally got back to us and confirmed that T connections have been put on hold indefinitely. They then said they could get us a 128K in 15 days or so, BY the end of March. 128K would have been sufficient until the end of April at our current growth when coupled with our Sprint fraction. Well, the 28th went by and we were then told April 3rd. April 3rd has come and gone and they are saying April 8th for the 128 and April 16th tentatively for the T-1. Interestingly MCI is blaming Nynex for the delays, and Nynex is blaming MCI, and we're the ones losing. Last we heard from Nynex was they were ready on the 3rd. MCI says Nynex told them they wouldn't be ready til the 8th. As my users are complaining 'This feels more like a dirt road than the Information Superhighway!' I have to wonder if MCI is screwing with us on purpose just trying to keep us from switching over to a Sprint connection which would have taken at most 5 weeks according to our contact at Sprint. If we had dropped MCI end of February and switched to Sprint we would have our T-1 NOW. Not next week, not 2 weeks, but NOW. I don't CARE whether MCI has good service AFTER the fact! I want the service NOW! They strung us along almost 2 months beyond our original due date and I am not a little steamed! Mark- PS: If we had dropped the MCI connect at end of February we could have avoided the necessity of hardware upgrades to make use of BGP routing. This would have saved us monthly costs of running 2 separate net connections, AND the costs of the RAM for our router, the programming of the router, etc... MCI does inded SUCK! -- mtenney@megalink.net Megalink Technical Support and Information
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4k3i91$k5d@news.megalink.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3137658D.35E5@valleynet.com> <4hdu5g$ma4@SNFC21_SRVR_WWW.PBI.net> <4hl33u$mmf@tabloid.amoco.com> <4icaio$mjh@news1.sympatico.ca> <31577E7F.7E80@tcd.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f9628,92c42a8507ea1486 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9628,public X-Google-Thread: 105c4d,92c42a8507ea1486 X-Google-Attributes: gid105c4d,public X-Google-Thread: 10f21d,92c42a8507ea1486 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f21d,public X-Google-Thread: 1550f9,92c42a8507ea1486 X-Google-Attributes: gid1550f9,public X-Google-Thread: 12ec63,92c42a8507ea1486 X-Google-Attributes: gid12ec63,public X-Google-Thread: 10bd82,92c42a8507ea1486 X-Google-Attributes: gid10bd82,public X-Google-Thread: ffd79,92c42a8507ea1486 X-Google-Attributes: gidffd79,public X-Google-Thread: fc7b2,92c42a8507ea1486 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc7b2,public From: mtenney@megalink.net (Mark) Subject: Re: MCI Sucks: BEWARE!!! Date: 1996/04/05 Message-ID: <4k3i91$k5d@news.megalink.net> X-Deja-AN: 145966308 references: <3137658D.35E5@valleynet.com> <4hdu5g$ma4@SNFC21_SRVR_WWW.PBI.net> <4hl33u$mmf@tabloid.amoco.com> <4icaio$mjh@news1.sympatico.ca> <31577E7F.7E80@tcd.net> organization: Megalink ISP reply-to: mtenney@megalink.net newsgroups: alt.internet.services,houston.internet.providers,ne.internet.services,sacramento.internet,necus.internet.news,necus.internet.announce,necus.internet.commerce,misc.news.internet.discuss,alt.internet.access,backbone.general,comp.dcom.telecom.tech,comp.dcom.frame-relay,di.internet