Article View: alt.internet.wireless
Article #125Re: Wireless & ADSL Question
From: pierce
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 22:30
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 22:30
55 lines
2866 bytes
2866 bytes
Go wireless for the whole lot its a hell of lot cheaper I run one notebook and 4 pc on a wireless network over 100m, with 1PC on DSL feeding the rest "[BnH]" <b18@iprimus.com.AUSTRALIA> wrote in message news:3dc95dc8$0$181$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net.au... > Are you sure the APs in setting 1 can goto 100m ? or the CAT cable can go > 100m ? > Its better to go with > > D1 <- cat5 -> DSL504 <- cat5 -> LinksysWAP11 w/ Yagi / Omni antena < ~~~~~ > > D2 & Nb. > > btw .. 100m from one end to the other .... what a house u have there? > > =bob= > > > "Shaw Goh (NetPlus Micro Computers)" <shaw@netplus.com.au> wrote in message > news:aqb1oh$kgj$1@nnrp.waia.asn.au... > > I am setting up ADSL at home with a desktop1 (also where the ADSL modem > > would be), another desktop2 (100m away), and a notebook (roaming about). > > > > Here's what Ive narrowed it down to. Which would be better? and reason? > > > > Desktop1 ---cat5--> DSL504 --cat5--> DWL900AP ---wireless--> Desktop2 & > > Notebook > > > > Priced at $1006 Inc GST > > > > OR > > > > --cat5--> DSL300 > > Desktop1 --cat5--> DI614+ < > > --wireless--> Desktop2 & > > Notebook > > > > Priced at (surprise surprise!) $1005 Inc GST > > > > Gee, I hope the graphics would work out! But basically, would you > recommend > > a DSL504 and DWL900AP combo OR a DI614+ and DSL300 combo? and Why? Or is > > there a better option altogether that I haven't thought of? > > > > Requirement is that no PC has to be on for any other PC to access ADSL. > > > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<aqc55d$flv$1$830fa7a5@news.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mailReferences:
<aqb1oh$kgj$1@nnrp.waia.asn.au> <3dc95dc8$0$181$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10d683,b4afa654758e2304 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d683,public X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,b4afa654758e2304 X-Google-Attributes: gid104fd2,public X-Google-Thread: 108c83,b4afa654758e2304 X-Google-Attributes: gid108c83,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-06 14:30:05 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: "pierce" <pierce@world-petroleum.org> Newsgroups: alt.internet.wireless,aus.computers,aus.computers.ibm-pc Subject: Re: Wireless & ADSL Question Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 22:30:06 -0000 Lines: 57 Message-ID: <aqc55d$flv$1$830fa7a5@news.demon.co.uk> References: <aqb1oh$kgj$1@nnrp.waia.asn.au> <3dc95dc8$0$181$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: world-petroleum2.demon.co.uk X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1036621805 16063 62.49.24.61 (6 Nov 2002 22:30:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 22:30:05 +0000 (UTC) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Priority: 3 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal