Article View: alt.internet.wireless
Article #191Re: FCC Broadband Proposal: too little, too late, too timid
From: Brad Allen
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 23:40
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 23:40
48 lines
4019 bytes
4019 bytes
" We need Internet connectivity provided by companies that are not in " the content or network services business. I was considering just this point when I was thinking about the benefit of satellite communications that XM Radio/Serius use. I think bottling up those satellites in content providers is a bad idea; instead, selling their bandwidth on a cost-with-margin basis would be much more useful to customers and to the providers, as far as I can tell. Instead of selling "XM Radio" or such, they could sell "x bits per second at y latency with congestion z for $A", i.e., bandwidth, delay, priority at some amount of money. If you choose to transmit porn to 22yos and get porn back from 22yos, or transmit pictures of your 80yo grandmother, or to receive pictures of the map to get you to your 80yo grandmother, or transmit financial transaction details and receive financial transaction details, or transmit targeting data, or receive music or talk audio or security video, or anything you want, that's between you and your far end, and whether you want to engage a 3rd party content provider would also be up to you. Otherwise, if you are required to use a content provider, there's an impediment to using the physical resources, and it will be harder to justify making physical resources available, and furthermore, if the impediment is that you are only allowed to use the physical resources in a narrowly construed way, such as using a particular content (XM radio, for instance), then you might not even be interested in the physical resources any more; perhaps that image of an X-Ray you wanted isn't being broadcast to you when you need it by that old gross drugged up dying hippie in NYC who has a TV show. No, that's useless: when you want a picture of the X-Ray of Grandma, pictures of plastic boobs from someone else at 4:30PM or whatever doesn't help you, when you're diagnosing at 10AM. That's closer to what we have now: less for less at higher cost, rather than more for more at lower cast. Why use satellites? Why use anything at all? They have particular qualities, including availabilities and usefulnesses, which makes them have particular values. Why not use satellites? Perhaps those qualities aren't what you need. But, perhaps their qualities ARE what you need, but everyone who has them doesn't do business with you, because they'd rather do business with bad business models that exclude the people actually interested in the productizable assets. I'm using satellite as an example; use math symbols for most my words. Fiber in an old oil pipe and under railroads is just as good an analogy. Generally, the ideas can be applied to LANs and WANs as well. They're more complex in those cases, but not by much.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4bc25e06$0$1594$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news-xfer.nntp.sonic.net!posts.news.sonic.net!nnrp1.nntp.sonic.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<o8tvp5d7h3tmeo0p52vr7rqh9qdfus6mt9@navasgroup.com> <higgy-A41F57.10524019032010@news.announcetech.com> <99udnUXbAcHPWz7WnZ2dnUVZ_oydnZ2d@posted.southvalleyinternet> <higgy-E176A3.11570319032010@news.announcetech.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,150f644e01c9c266 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,150f644e01c9c266 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gide43d82042,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news-xfer.nntp.sonic.net!posts.news.sonic.net!nnrp1.nntp.sonic.net!not-for-mail Newsgroups: alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet Subject: Re: FCC Broadband Proposal: too little, too late, too timid References: <o8tvp5d7h3tmeo0p52vr7rqh9qdfus6mt9@navasgroup.com> <higgy-A41F57.10524019032010@news.announcetech.com> <99udnUXbAcHPWz7WnZ2dnUVZ_oydnZ2d@posted.southvalleyinternet> <higgy-E176A3.11570319032010@news.announcetech.com> X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) From: qm@sonic.net (Brad Allen) Originator: qm@sonic.net (Brad Allen) Date: 11 Apr 2010 23:40:54 GMT Lines: 48 Message-ID: <4bc25e06$0$1594$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> Organization: Sonic.Net NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Apr 2010 23:40:54 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: e2f9622e.news.sonic.net X-Trace: DXC=Ig@EVSeh60UW;TRF<EA3jZm4K\QM1CV^P1OYf0H`?;XQgKTmP355YXX49JS04A7<JRiB8P28afVkW=\J3W1O[>W\ X-Complaints-To: abuse@sonic.net