Article View: alt.internet.wireless
Article #375Re: How many Google wireless access points for San Francisco?
From: Jeff Liebermann
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:59
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:59
51 lines
3463 bytes
3463 bytes
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:25:58 +0000 (UTC), spope33@speedymail.org (Steve Pope) wrote: >Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us> wrote: > >>Not common? 5.7GHz is where all the wireless backhauls are currently >>located. >> http://www.wbanc.com >>If SF decided to go with 5.7GHz 802.11a clients, then I'm sure the >>market would gladly support replaceing everything you own with the >>latest and greatest. (Evolution. Upgrade or die). However, >>relocating the backhauls to 22Ghz may be a bit of a challenge. > >You mean 24 GHz I think. Y'er correct. It's 24GHz. Equipment is available but it's not cheap. Dragonwave Air Pair 50: | http://www.tessco.com/products/displayProductInfo.do?sku=447702&eventPage=1 Only $22,000 each. >>considering the mesh network rule of thumb of the week of no more than >>3-4 hops from client to backhaul, and 100 access points per square >>mile, that means 25-33 backhaul radios or wired connections per square >>mile. >Despite their fumbling, Google definitely has the money to >deploy that hardware this project requires. Google's only limit >is the laws of physics. I've worked on wasted projects that proposed to solve technical issues by throwing money at the problem. I've also learned that if it doesn't work on paper, it's not going to work in the field. I find the Philadelphia system entertaining to follow as technical details and the entire topology seems to change every month. I suspect that the SF network will be much of the same as Google discovers RF reality. I'm sure the stockholders will eventually have something to say when this project starts resembling a financial black hole. I also find it entertaining to read about how such networks will be used. The common description is "untethered access" where users with PDA's, laptops, and VoIP phones, roam around the city while browsing the internet. I learned a few lessons watching Metricom and found that what most users *REALLY* want is a cheap full time connection in the home. My guess(tm) is that the bulk of the use will be from fixed locations and solely as a cost reduction (or elimination) expedient. -- Jeff Liebermann jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<evnsl1tl9hh8vn6n9foam63fvn4t3tqp03@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!pln-w!spln!rex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews1References:
<0sdrl1tcp4bpoi1qonabuuk4bkujoapgpu@4ax.com> <MPG.1dc7aab8eec3a48298a8f8@corp.supernews.com> <a4OdnTAUJ-LBhMPeRVn-qQ@adelphia.com> <p2lsl155nduvnt553t28jdq67m3hhkdpr7@4ax.com> <djlmam$jgi$1@blue.rahul.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,7866016d66b9e3e9 X-Google-Thread: fa874,7866016d66b9e3e9 X-Google-Attributes: gid104fd2,gidfa874,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!pln-w!spln!rex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews1 From: Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us> Newsgroups: alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet Subject: Re: How many Google wireless access points for San Francisco? Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:59:35 -0700 Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com Lines: 51 Message-ID: <evnsl1tl9hh8vn6n9foam63fvn4t3tqp03@4ax.com> References: <0sdrl1tcp4bpoi1qonabuuk4bkujoapgpu@4ax.com> <MPG.1dc7aab8eec3a48298a8f8@corp.supernews.com> <a4OdnTAUJ-LBhMPeRVn-qQ@adelphia.com> <p2lsl155nduvnt553t28jdq67m3hhkdpr7@4ax.com> <djlmam$jgi$1@blue.rahul.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: p-697.newsdawg.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783