Article View: alt.internet.wireless
Article #393Re: Good wireless bridge?
From: Philip J. Koenig
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 00:17
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 00:17
48 lines
2858 bytes
2858 bytes
In article <42726fa4$0$1909$2c56edd9@news.cablerocket.com>, campbell@alliancecable.net (Airhead) writes... > > "DaveC" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message > news:0001HW.BE979820007C3EEBF04075B0@news.sonic.net... > > I want a wireless bridge (is that redundant?) to act as an ethernet > > converter, connecting to different brand APs (one at a time, of > course). > > Would like to buy only 1 bridge and have it work with other brands > of APs. An > > external antenna connector would be a plus. > > > > I hear good things about D-Link's DWL-900AP+, rev C. > > > > Do you have a favorite? If so, what do you like about it? > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > Please, no "Go Google this" replies. I wouldn't > > ask a question here if I hadn't done that already. > > I think what you are looking for is an ethernet bridge or a workgroup > bridge. > One that will bridge multiple clients. The Zyxel g-405 is one example. > They should talk to any AP but there is no guarantee. A WiFi access point is simply an ethernet to WiFi bridge, so I assume what the OP wants is just a recommendation for a WiFi AP? Since WiFi AP's these days tend to be more expensive than WiFi routers, and because (according to Jeff Liebermann) most WiFi routers have an undocumented "AP" mode which can be used simply by plugging an ethernet cable into the LAN side and leaving the WAN side unconnected, you may want to consider that direction if price is an issue. -- * Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which * * differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are * * even incapable of forming such opinions. -- Albert Einstein * * * * To send email, remove numbers and spaces: pjkusenet64 @ ekahuna27 . com * * Simple answers are for simple minds. Try a new way of looking at things. *
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MPG.1cdc6e6719b73f9398a715@corp.supernews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<0001HW.BE979820007C3EEBF04075B0@news.sonic.net> <42726fa4$0$1909$2c56edd9@news.cablerocket.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,b9ec2c24bcb2feb8 X-Google-Thread: 1128fd,b9ec2c24bcb2feb8 X-Google-Thread: fa874,b9ec2c24bcb2feb8 X-Google-Attributes: gid104fd2,gid1128fd,gidfa874,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: Philip J. Koenig <See_email_@ddress_below.This_one_is.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.internet.wireless,comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,ba.internet Subject: Re: Good wireless bridge? Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:17:14 -0700 Organization: The Ekahuna Organization Message-ID: <MPG.1cdc6e6719b73f9398a715@corp.supernews.com> References: <0001HW.BE979820007C3EEBF04075B0@news.sonic.net> <42726fa4$0$1909$2c56edd9@news.cablerocket.com> X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.50 X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Lines: 48