🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mon, 06 May 2002 23:15:55 -0700,
in the newsgroup ba.internet,
Paul Grohe <grohe@galaxy.nsc.com> 
from Completely Disorganized posted:

> On Sun, 05 May 2002 02:30:44 GMT,
> in the newsgroup ba.internet,
> "colgate" <colgate@myemail.com> 
> from Prodigy Internet http://www.prodigy.com posted:
> 
> > This value from FCC web site is fairly close, values from many well known
> > brand such as CISCO's 100mW is posted on FCC form 731 for FCC authorization
> > approval and that is a well quoted value.
> > 
> > However, if somebody could post the FCCID of each 5435 and 5312 then it
> > could easily identified if there are two different batch and different
> > quality control from different mfg.
> 
> 
> The 720-5435 has the following markings:
> 
>  Sub-Assembly# 720.5435
> 
>  Supplier par# 750.5435
> 
> SMC7004AWBR 
> 
> FCCID: HEDWG3004A-17
> 
> Here is the result of the FCC-ID search:
> 
> 
> <https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/oet/forms/reports/Search_Form.hts?mode=Edit&form=Exhibits&application_id=101328&fcc_id=HEDWG3004A-17>
> 
> The first block-diagram document shows the card as a Harris
> (Intersil) HFA3841 PRISM II chipset.
> 
> Looking at page 13 of "test report 1", it states that the
> measured transmitter output power is about 10dBm. 30dBm is 1W, so
> 20dB less is 100mW. There you go....100mW transmit power at the
> connector. 

Whups! midnight-math error. Forgot P^2.

It's a whopping 10mW (0.01W) output peak power.

Cheers,
Paul Grohe