Article View: alt.internet.wireless
Article #408Re: limited 802.11b range, SMC WAP/USR client, multiple WAPS, 802.11a as an alternative?
From: Mark
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 05:20
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 05:20
60 lines
3117 bytes
3117 bytes
"Paul Grohe" <grohe@galaxy.nsc.com> wrote in message news:7u5hdu0a288v7j4okri3t02h9rfpouafvp@4ax.com... > On Mon, 06 May 2002 23:15:55 -0700, > in the newsgroup ba.internet, > Paul Grohe <grohe@galaxy.nsc.com> > from Completely Disorganized posted: > > > On Sun, 05 May 2002 02:30:44 GMT, > > in the newsgroup ba.internet, > > "colgate" <colgate@myemail.com> > > from Prodigy Internet http://www.prodigy.com posted: > > > > > This value from FCC web site is fairly close, values from many well known > > > brand such as CISCO's 100mW is posted on FCC form 731 for FCC authorization > > > approval and that is a well quoted value. > > > > > > However, if somebody could post the FCCID of each 5435 and 5312 then it > > > could easily identified if there are two different batch and different > > > quality control from different mfg. > > > > > > The 720-5435 has the following markings: > > > > Sub-Assembly# 720.5435 > > > > Supplier par# 750.5435 > > > > SMC7004AWBR > > > > FCCID: HEDWG3004A-17 > > > > Here is the result of the FCC-ID search: > > > > > > <https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/oet/forms/reports/Search_Form .hts?mode=Edit&form=Exhibits&application_id=101328&fcc_id=HEDWG3004A-17> > > > > The first block-diagram document shows the card as a Harris > > (Intersil) HFA3841 PRISM II chipset. > > > > Looking at page 13 of "test report 1", it states that the > > measured transmitter output power is about 10dBm. 30dBm is 1W, so > > 20dB less is 100mW. There you go....100mW transmit power at the > > connector. > > Whups! midnight-math error. Forgot P^2. > > It's a whopping 10mW (0.01W) output peak power. > > Cheers, > Paul Grohe > Next time save yourself the math and goto: http://www.hamradiousa.com/rfcalc.html ;-)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<udhddor72q0mb7@corp.supernews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<hlez8.20474$Yb1.48036@sea-read.news.verio.net> <3cd28a97.1926740@news-server.neo.rr.com> <eoCA8.10282$JZ6.213699@dfw-read.news.verio.net> <NeJA8.4997$2W3.551370928@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com> <PBWA8.10431$JZ6.218522@dfw-read.news.verio.net> <oP0B8.10999$Sr4.1636689958@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com> <gapeduo4gr7les3mcccdq37ikh3tue5bff@4ax.com> <7u5hdu0a288v7j4okri3t02h9rfpouafvp@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,64500d3ffd523aad X-Google-Attributes: gid104fd2,public X-Google-Thread: fa874,64500d3ffd523aad X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-07 22:20:57 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Mark" <AntiSpamFilter@Charter.net> Newsgroups: alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet Subject: Re: limited 802.11b range, SMC WAP/USR client, multiple WAPS, 802.11a as an alternative? Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 22:20:43 -0700 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <udhddor72q0mb7@corp.supernews.com> References: <hlez8.20474$Yb1.48036@sea-read.news.verio.net> <3cd28a97.1926740@news-server.neo.rr.com> <eoCA8.10282$JZ6.213699@dfw-read.news.verio.net> <NeJA8.4997$2W3.551370928@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com> <PBWA8.10431$JZ6.218522@dfw-read.news.verio.net> <oP0B8.10999$Sr4.1636689958@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com> <gapeduo4gr7les3mcccdq37ikh3tue5bff@4ax.com> <7u5hdu0a288v7j4okri3t02h9rfpouafvp@4ax.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Lines: 62