Article View: alt.internet.wireless
Article #415Re: limited 802.11b range, SMC WAP/USR client, multiple WAPS, 802.11a as an alternative?
From: Gary Funck
Date: Sat, 04 May 2002 16:03
Date: Sat, 04 May 2002 16:03
49 lines
3914 bytes
3914 bytes
"John S" <camper123456789@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:MPG.173d2849fab7f2ed989749@news-01.easynews.com... > In article <NeJA8.4997$2W3.551370928@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>, > colgate@myemail.com says... > > There are two FCCID issued to the same SMC7004AWBR > > > > One is mfg by AMIT with "PBL-WIP-300" (35 mW) > > Second one is mfg by ACCTON with "HEDWG3004A-17" (13 mW) > > > > Looks like SMC ordered from different OEM and using the same plastic case. > > makes one wonder which one is better or were they made by the same company > > with different quality control. > > Again, ACCTON could have ordered from AMIT then apply itself a FCCID#. > The difference is the the AMIT unit (5432) 12VDC works pretty well and > is also used by other big name vendors but my memory fade will not > help me remember who. > > ACCTON I am told is owned by or associated with SMC and produces the > 5435 5VDC which is crap. > > I own the 5435 and it has real problems sometimes. But, it has been > working OK lately. John, I've seen the following problems with the model 5435 SWC7004AWBR unit: (1) quality problems (first unit had very weak signal receive/xmit, and would hang in both wireless and wired mode) and (2) problems on the wired (copper) LAN where it would hang unpredictably, (3) quirky (ie, difficult to reproduce) problems with DHCP, and various other aspects of operation, (4) lack of (any) decent monitoring and logging functions. As an aside, I updated the firmware to the latest version in both cases. I may have gotten a handle on the frequent hangs on the wired network: problems with 100bT connections, or perhaps a mixed network of 10bT and 100bT connections. I've now gone to each of my desktop PC's and dumbed them down to "10 base T (full duplex)", instead of "automatic" (where they sense whether the connection is 100Mbs or 10Mbs.) (thanks to Paul Grohe for suggesting this idea). After doing this, based on a sample of 1.5 days of operation, it seems that the wired network hangs have gone away. Now it may be the case that the NIC's I'm using are too old/cheap to really work well in a 100bT setting (everything in my home net was effectively 10bT before because of some intervening cheap-o hubs that I was using). I kind of doubt that though - becuase of the numerous problems reported by other users of the SMC 7004WABR model 5435 gear. Also, most of my PC's at home were functioning well in a 100bT switched setting at work before I brought them home.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<_DTA8.10400$JZ6.218009@dfw-read.news.verio.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!iad-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!dfw-read.news.verio.net.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<hlez8.20474$Yb1.48036@sea-read.news.verio.net> <3cd28a97.1926740@news-server.neo.rr.com> <eoCA8.10282$JZ6.213699@dfw-read.news.verio.net> <NeJA8.4997$2W3.551370928@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com> <MPG.173d2849fab7f2ed989749@news-01.easynews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,64500d3ffd523aad X-Google-Attributes: gid104fd2,public X-Google-Thread: fa874,64500d3ffd523aad X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-04 09:03:25 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!iad-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!dfw-read.news.verio.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Gary Funck" <gary@intrepid.com> Newsgroups: alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet References: <hlez8.20474$Yb1.48036@sea-read.news.verio.net> <3cd28a97.1926740@news-server.neo.rr.com> <eoCA8.10282$JZ6.213699@dfw-read.news.verio.net> <NeJA8.4997$2W3.551370928@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com> <MPG.173d2849fab7f2ed989749@news-01.easynews.com> Subject: Re: limited 802.11b range, SMC WAP/USR client, multiple WAPS, 802.11a as an alternative? Lines: 52 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: <_DTA8.10400$JZ6.218009@dfw-read.news.verio.net> Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 09:03:40 -0700 NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.173.57.250 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verio.net X-Trace: dfw-read.news.verio.net 1020528250 64.173.57.250 (Sat, 04 May 2002 16:04:10 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 04 May 2002 16:04:10 GMT Organization: Verio