Article View: alt.internet.wireless
Article #442Re: limited 802.11b range, SMC WAP/USR client, multiple WAPS, 802.11a as an alternative?
From: Gary Funck
Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 01:18
Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 01:18
101 lines
6118 bytes
6118 bytes
Jeff, Following up on your recommendation to consult the reviews at http://pracitcallynetworked.com I found (1) the professional review was quite positive, but (2) the user reviews are generally negative. The various negative reviews of the SMC 7004AWBR have to do with: frequent lock ups of the wired (ie, cat5 copper) LAN, overheating of the box perhaps conttributing to lack of reliability, confusing indications on the front-panel LED's (ie, WLAN light always on, instead of on with the WLAN is active), and lack of useful info. in the log. I'll add to this list something I saw in another review note - some problems in the operation of DHCP (same address to different MAC addresses, apparently). Many of these problems seem to stem from the fact that there are two different physical implementations of the SMC 7004AWBR. As (bad) luck would have it, I seem to have bought the model# that has lock up problems. Ironically, the model that the professional reviewers reviewed is the one that apparently has no such problems, and has some other problems (that I've encountered) fixed. In closing, many thanks to Paul Grohe, who was extremely helpful and patient in helping me isolate the problems with the wired LAN and offered suggestions for diagnosing problems with the wireless LAN. excerpts: http://www.practicallynetworked.com/opinions/index.asp?pid=377 Not Recommended by Allen W. on 4/2/2002 BOTTOM LINE: Stay Away. REALITY vs. EXPECTATIONS: much worse than I expected. DETAILS: I originally recommended this after using it for 6 days, but alas, it crapped out after 6 days. The wireless piece worked, but the wired ports became unresponsive. I know its not a problem w/ my PC, since I have 2 laptops as well that stopped working on the network and work fine on my neighbors network. I waited an hour for a customer service rep who was clueless. He had me adjusting a number of settings on the computer, (versus the router) and was oblivious to the fact that 3 separate computers stopped working at the same time. After 45 minutes of tinkering, he gave up and told me to return the unit and try another. What a waste of time. Recommended by LouLou on 3/1/2002 BOTTOM LINE: Make sure u get part #720.5312 and avoid #720.5435 REALITY vs. EXPECTATIONS: about as I expected. DETAILS: Last week,purchased an SMC7004AWBR last with an SMC2662W USB wireless client for my 2 pcs at home. When I installed them I noticed on SMC's website for driver and firmware download that there were indeed 2 different part numbers for this barricade. I had unfortunately gotten part# 720.5435 The box has a tin underside, the power adapter plug 5volts DC sticks out ackwardly from the router. The wireless connection light is always on despite there are no wired clients. Finally the log file is just plain broken even with latest firmware. I returned it to the merchant but at a different franchise location that accepts returns from other stores and got by chance the better Barricade part#720-5312 This one is completely housed top and bottom with a uniform quality finish. The front has a classy gloss protective covering compared to the other that had a flat mat cheaper finish. The wireless connection light works when there is really a wireless client using the Barricade! The log file works properly with the right date without any need to be connected tothe net like some other wondered. The power supply for this one is a hefty 12volts DC unit that plugs into the barricade in a convention way that does not get in the way of things. The review pictures of the html setup screens on practicallynetworked.com are screen shots of the part#720-5312. The setup screens from part#720.5435 are not the same format or color schemes. Make sure you open up the box before you buy and make sure you get the good one part part#720-5312. later good luck Recommended by mightyq on 3/1/2002 BOTTOM LINE: Decent router for decent price. REALITY vs. EXPECTATIONS: worse than I expected. DETAILS: I upgraded to firmware 1.41 with part number 750.5435. This killed my wired lan connection, although my wireless connection still worked. Router also needs reboot periodically. For $150, it's a good deal. Recommended by Lucky on 2/27/2002 BOTTOM LINE: Mine locks up too.. but otherwise works well REALITY vs. EXPECTATIONS: about as I expected. DETAILS: Love the router works well, but occasionally every 2 days or so it does lock up. Cant run the internet at all, just reset it and all is back. Just put on the new firmware 1.41.003 and it locked about 4 hours after, but now running for 2 days. We will see how it goes.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<UzlA8.10151$JZ6.210863@dfw-read.news.verio.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!iad-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!dfw-read.news.verio.net.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<hlez8.20474$Yb1.48036@sea-read.news.verio.net> <q89tcu8hplk5cqhoelav5i05no52r4o4f6@4ax.com> <RhZz8.9912$JZ6.205824@dfw-read.news.verio.net> <5ch2duo9ims5jdvombhb577rpnvlbated9@4ax.com> <FMjA8.10127$JZ6.209798@dfw-read.news.verio.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,64500d3ffd523aad X-Google-Attributes: gid104fd2,public X-Google-Thread: fa874,64500d3ffd523aad X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-02 18:17:59 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!iad-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!dfw-read.news.verio.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Gary Funck" <gary@intrepid.com> Newsgroups: alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet References: <hlez8.20474$Yb1.48036@sea-read.news.verio.net> <q89tcu8hplk5cqhoelav5i05no52r4o4f6@4ax.com> <RhZz8.9912$JZ6.205824@dfw-read.news.verio.net> <5ch2duo9ims5jdvombhb577rpnvlbated9@4ax.com> <FMjA8.10127$JZ6.209798@dfw-read.news.verio.net> Subject: Re: limited 802.11b range, SMC WAP/USR client, multiple WAPS, 802.11a as an alternative? Lines: 104 Organization: Intrepid Technology, Inc. Mountain View, CA X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: <UzlA8.10151$JZ6.210863@dfw-read.news.verio.net> Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 18:18:00 -0700 NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.195.190.24 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verio.net X-Trace: dfw-read.news.verio.net 1020388724 192.195.190.24 (Fri, 03 May 2002 01:18:44 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 01:18:44 GMT