Article View: alt.internet.wireless
Article #594Re: AT&T Wireless Broadband -- no phone service for over two days
From: Frank St. Claire
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 03:48
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 03:48
76 lines
4786 bytes
4786 bytes
Charles, I am happy for you and your three neighbors. You obviously are not on Tower 165 in Dallas. I imagine that there are some happy users and also assume most of the unhappy users have given up by now and just disconnected the "service". I know that the mention of AT&T Wireless Broadband is greeted with howls of laughter by any of my neighbors, who almost without exception, had the garbage ripped out after the first couple of weeks. For every satisfied customer, I would almost wager that there are an equal number that have dumped the service or had to add additional analog lines simply to be able to receive faxes or insure that their monitored alarm and security systems work reliably -- which AT&T now admits may not with their equipment. BTW, I just spent two hours with a Tier 1 trying to identify tonight's problem -- Error 691 and they identified it isn't due to my machines or wiring. And I am sure this problem will go back into the bowels of the AT&T rocket scientists that unleashed this piece of beta testing garbage on unsuspecting consumers never to be heard from again. And even though they lied through their teeth (remember the "Phone, Fax and Surf at the Same Time" marketing blitz that they had to discontinue as their campaign slogan when everyone discovered the hard way that the service didn't an still doesn't work with 90% of the faxes in the Western World?), the few of us that have hung in with the service have kept the eternal hope that these clowns would finally get their act together. Well, it hasn't happened yet. It's now been 10 months of what many of us has referred to as our period as "lab rats." Most of us, given ADSL or cable modem, would like to get out of the maze. The least AT&T could do is to be truthful and up front about how bad the service is instead of suckering people in with the promise of high speed broadband that has never once reached even 50% of the speeds originally promised with the service. AT&T's game plan is merely to try to glom onto the local telephone service as their primary objective as a way of stopping the hemorrhaging they are experiencing from ever-dwindling long distance revenues. With their stock down almost 75% already and still headed down, they will soon be following in the footsteps of Worldcom with the pink slips. Hopefully, they will begin with the marketing department that created this fiasco by marketing before it was finished being developed. The only one who could be more unhappier at this point than one of ADB's customers is one of AT&T's shareholders. Again, I am glad you have had good luck, but for me and most of those who I know who have tried it, it is still a continuing nightmare. Regards, Frank On Sun, 04 Mar 2001 00:20:06 -0600, qrjne1@nveznvy.arg (Charles) wrote: >I haven't seen many others complaining in this group. The neighbors three >doors down love their ADB. > >Can we see a show of posts of how many people are using ADB and whether >they like it or not? > >On Fri, 02 Mar 2001 23:13:39 GMT, Frank St. Claire <fstclair@airmail.net> >wrote: > >>Besides screwing up the "high speed" Internet service on an almost >>daily basis, this week our home phone has been out for over two days. >>They have lost trouble tickets and basically sat on their hands. >> >>If you are considering this beta service, just be prepared to keep >>back up analog phone lines for voice, fax and Internet ....
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<el06atc1pskvjhvd1driivvokcn28kmeao@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!newsfeed.mathworks.com!wn3feed!worldnet.att.net!135.173.83.71!wnfilter1!worldnet-localpost!bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<r0a0ato7k3sd84ah2mu96gihsfgvk4ccl7@4ax.com> <32F290D9EC2C2DBB.A31C3CFA88A921CB.B67CCEFF2B6E8212@lp.airnews.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,5863b5e6b58cf872 X-Google-Attributes: gid104fd2,public X-Google-Thread: 100579,5863b5e6b58cf872 X-Google-Attributes: gid100579,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-04 19:52:10 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!newsfeed.mathworks.com!wn3feed!worldnet.att.net!135.173.83.71!wnfilter1!worldnet-localpost!bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Frank St. Claire <fstclair@airmail.net> Newsgroups: alt.internet.wireless,dfw.internet.providers Subject: Re: AT&T Wireless Broadband -- no phone service for over two days Message-ID: <el06atc1pskvjhvd1driivvokcn28kmeao@4ax.com> References: <r0a0ato7k3sd84ah2mu96gihsfgvk4ccl7@4ax.com> <32F290D9EC2C2DBB.A31C3CFA88A921CB.B67CCEFF2B6E8212@lp.airnews.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 77 Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 03:48:38 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.44.153.115 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 983764118 12.44.153.115 (Mon, 05 Mar 2001 03:48:38 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 03:48:38 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet