Article View: alt.internet.wireless
Article #627Another Poor New User Gets the Bad News About AT&T Digital Broadband
From: A. J. (Tony) Schiavone
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 00:00
111 lines
4748 bytes
4748 bytes
Hi all, I just wanted to relate another new user's problems with the service. Text of message is below. - Tony - Richard, I feel your pain. I've been on this service for 3+ months now. As they add more people the service gets worse. You might want to check out yourfreeforum.com/hsd for chronicles of other people's experiences with the service. It ain't pretty. To summarize the problems with the service. 1. Both fax machines and fax modems cannot receive faxes. I haven't verfied this, I've only tried to fax out with my fax modem and it works. But so many other people complained about this it must be true. 2. The phone circuits are getting overloaded. So fast busies out, "all circuits are busy" messages in. 3. Games such as Quake II and Half-life do not work. 4. Pings are much higher for a so-called broadband service. Lately, the network is becoming overloaded and you see the terrible ping results that you show below. 5. DSS and Tivo boxes have trouble dialing out to order movies, download program lists. Haven't verified this one either but I do have a DSS. I'll probably order a movie in the next couple of weeks to see if it still works. If you try the ping in the morning, it will be in the 115-130 msec range. As the day progresses, it gets worse, similar to what you show below. AT&T is supposedly working on the problem, but obviously haven't fixed it yet. - Tony - --- Richard Robson <rrobson@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > 8/5/00 at 3:15 PM - less than 24 hours after > installation: > Pinging www.apple.com [17.254.0.91] with 32 bytes of > data: > > Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=328ms TTL=6 > Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=465ms TTL=6 > Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=469ms TTL=6 > Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=249ms TTL=6 > Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=462ms TTL=6 > Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=6 > Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=6 > Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=409ms TTL=6 > Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=564ms TTL=6 > Request timed out. > > Ping statistics for 17.254.0.91: > Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 9, Lost = 1 (10% > loss), > Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: > Minimum = 164ms, Maximum = 564ms, Average = > 337ms > > -----Original Message----- > From: A. J. (Tony) Schiavone <schiavoneaj@yahoo.com> > Newsgroups: worldnet.help.digital-broadband > Date: Saturday, July 29, 2000 3:08 PM > Subject: Anyone else still having bad pings?? > > > >Hi all, > > > >For the last couple of days, I've been having good > pings in the morning and > >terrible ones in the afternoon. I called AT&T and > they said they were > >fixing a tower and rerouting us through another one > and that was causing > the > >delay. Are they ever going to fix the tower or is > the tower even the > >problem? FA Jordan was able to verify this also. > Anyone else having this > >problem? > > > >Pinging www.apple.com [17.254.0.91] with 32 bytes > of data: > > > >Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=262ms TTL=4 > >Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=673ms TTL=4 > >Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=214ms TTL=4 > >Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=234ms TTL=4 > >Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=218ms TTL=4 > >Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=232ms TTL=4 > >Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=233ms TTL=4 > >Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=202ms TTL=4 > >Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=4 > >Reply from 17.254.0.91: bytes=32 time=606ms TTL=4 > > > >Ping statistics for 17.254.0.91: > > > > Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% > loss), > > > >Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: > > > > Minimum = 182ms, Maximum = 673ms, Average = > 305ms > > > >The ping should be a steady 115-130 msec. > > > >- Tony - > > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<lc2j5.22751$RG6.1886310@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,8948b4a43ee1a5db,start X-Google-Attributes: gid104fd2,public X-Google-Thread: 100579,8948b4a43ee1a5db,start X-Google-Attributes: gid100579,public From: "A. J. (Tony) Schiavone" <schiavoneaj@yahoo.com> Subject: Another Poor New User Gets the Bad News About AT&T Digital Broadband Date: 2000/08/06 Message-ID: <lc2j5.22751$RG6.1886310@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> X-Deja-AN: 654919378 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 965521297 209.186.204.46 (Sun, 06 Aug 2000 00:21:37 GMT) Organization: AT&T Worldnet NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 00:21:37 GMT Newsgroups: alt.internet.wireless,dfw.internet.providers