🚀 go-pugleaf

CEO Council wrote:

> We here in the CEO Council are very happy the stock market has went
> down 

Yer grammer is purty weak fer CEOs..

I'm happy it went down too, made my oil holdings gush!

Oh...btw...go fuck yerself.

In article <G6p4d.1301593$ic1.132435@news.easynews.com>,
Serious Sam  <bitbucket> wrote:
>CEO Council wrote:
>
>> We here in the CEO Council are very happy the stock market has went
>> down 
>
>Yer grammer is purty weak fer CEOs..

But par for the course for a President, prolly.

-- 
  

Spammay Blockay wrote:

> In article <G6p4d.1301593$ic1.132435@news.easynews.com>,
> Serious Sam  <bitbucket> wrote:
> 
>>CEO Council wrote:
>>
>>
>>>We here in the CEO Council are very happy the stock market has went
>>>down 
>>
>>Yer grammer is purty weak fer CEOs..
> 
> 
> But par for the course for a President, prolly.

If not the chairman of the Federal Reserve, eh?

"I did not have sex with that woman"...

"Depends on how you define the meaning of is"...

Serious Sam wrote:

> Spammay Blockay wrote:
> 
>> In article <G6p4d.1301593$ic1.132435@news.easynews.com>,
>> Serious Sam  <bitbucket> wrote:
>>
>>> CEO Council wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> We here in the CEO Council are very happy the stock market has went
>>>> down 
>>>
>>>
>>> Yer grammer is purty weak fer CEOs..
>>
>>
>>
>> But par for the course for a President, prolly.
> 
> 
> If not the chairman of the Federal Reserve, eh?
> 
> "I did not have sex with that woman"...
> 
> "Depends on how you define the meaning of is"...
> 

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-outlook28jun28,1,4606275.column?coll=la-home-nation

"Consider the scorecard. During Clinton's two terms, the median income 
for American families increased by a solid 15% after inflation, 
according to Census Bureau figures. But it rose even faster for African 
Americans (33%) and Hispanics (24%) than it did for whites (14%).

The growth was so widely shared that from 1993 through 1999, families in 
the bottom fifth of the income distribution saw their incomes increase 
faster than those in the top 5%. By comparison, under President Reagan 
in the 1980s, those in the top 5% increased their income more than five 
times faster than the bottom 20%.

Likewise, the poverty rate under Clinton fell 25%, the biggest 
eight-year decline since the 1960s. It fell even faster for particularly 
vulnerable groups like blacks, Hispanics and children. Again the 
contrast with Reagan is striking. During Reagan's two terms, the number 
of Americans in poverty fell by just 77,000. During Clinton's two terms, 
the number of Americans in poverty plummeted by 8.1 million. The number 
of children in poverty fell by 50,000 under Reagan. Under Clinton the 
number was 4.1 million. That's a ratio of 80 to 1.

Leave aside the question of how much Clinton's drive to eliminate the 
federal deficit contributed to the economic boom that powered most of 
these gains. He also developed a comprehensive set of initiatives to 
spread the benefits of prosperity to more families by demanding and 
honoring work.

Welfare reform pushed more low-income families into the job market, 
where they could benefit from the rising tide. Then Clinton made work 
more rewarding with increases in the minimum wage and the earned-income 
tax credit, the creation of the Children's Health Insurance Program (to 
cover the children of working-poor families), and expanded funding for 
day care. He eliminated the deficit while cutting taxes for average 
families.

And while delivering all these benefits for traditionally Democratic 
constituencies, Clinton extended the party's appeal up the income 
ladder. By marrying government activism to fiscal discipline and 
demanding personal responsibility in social policy, he triggered a 
realignment of socially moderate Northern suburbs toward the Democrats, 
a change that remains central to his party's hopes in 2004."




If you want to be really outraged at Bush's flip-flops and lies, read 
this: http://www.compassiongate.com/promises/index.htm

Orwellian Prophecy wrote:

> Serious Sam wrote:
> 
>> Spammay Blockay wrote:
>>
>>> In article <G6p4d.1301593$ic1.132435@news.easynews.com>,
>>> Serious Sam  <bitbucket> wrote:
>>>
>>>> CEO Council wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> We here in the CEO Council are very happy the stock market has went
>>>>> down 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yer grammer is purty weak fer CEOs..
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> But par for the course for a President, prolly.
>>
>>
>>
>> If not the chairman of the Federal Reserve, eh?
>>
>> "I did not have sex with that woman"...
>>
>> "Depends on how you define the meaning of is"...
>>

http://www.infowars.com/saved%20pages/Prior_Knowledge/Clinton_let_bin_laden.htm

Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize
Sudan offered up the terrorist and data on his network. The 
then-president and his advisors didn't respond.

By MANSOOR IJAZ
President Clinton and his national security team ignored several 
opportunities to capture Osama bin Laden and his terrorist associates, 
including one as late as last year.

I know because I negotiated more than one of the opportunities.

 From 1996 to 1998, I opened unofficial channels between Sudan and the 
Clinton administration. I met with officials in both countries, 
including Clinton, U.S. National Security Advisor Samuel R. "Sandy" 
Berger and Sudan's president and intelligence chief. President Omar 
Hassan Ahmed Bashir, who wanted terrorism sanctions against Sudan 
lifted, offered the arrest and extradition of Bin Laden and detailed 
intelligence data about the global networks constructed by Egypt's 
Islamic Jihad, Iran's Hezbollah and the Palestinian Hamas.

Among those in the networks were the two hijackers who piloted 
commercial airliners into the World Trade Center.

The silence of the Clinton administration in responding to these offers 
was deafening.

Serious Sam wrote:

> Orwellian Prophecy wrote:
> 
>> Serious Sam wrote:
>>
>>> Spammay Blockay wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <G6p4d.1301593$ic1.132435@news.easynews.com>,
>>>> Serious Sam  <bitbucket> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> CEO Council wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> We here in the CEO Council are very happy the stock market has went
>>>>>> down 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yer grammer is purty weak fer CEOs..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But par for the course for a President, prolly.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If not the chairman of the Federal Reserve, eh?
>>>
>>> "I did not have sex with that woman"...
>>>
>>> "Depends on how you define the meaning of is"...
>>>
> 
> http://www.infowars.com/saved%20pages/Prior_Knowledge/Clinton_let_bin_laden.htm 
> 
> 
> Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize
> Sudan offered up the terrorist and data on his network. The 
> then-president and his advisors didn't respond.
> 
> By MANSOOR IJAZ


You may not trot that tired lame ass od Monsoor quote again!  That's 
been debunked a hundred times!

Bin Laden hadn't sone anything at that time!!

And anyway, the fact that bin Laden hasn't been caught yet is proof that 
Bush was in on 9/11 and aided bin Laden, his family's business partner. 
  Bush knew that he was on tenuous ground for stealing the election with 
his brother's help, and the supreme court justices his father owned.  He 
assisted bin Laden to cement his presidency and divert attention from 
his other disastrous plans and actions.

Orwellian Prophecy wrote:

> Serious Sam wrote:
> 
>> Orwellian Prophecy wrote:
>>
>>> Serious Sam wrote:
>>>
>>>> Spammay Blockay wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <G6p4d.1301593$ic1.132435@news.easynews.com>,
>>>>> Serious Sam  <bitbucket> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> CEO Council wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We here in the CEO Council are very happy the stock market has went
>>>>>>> down 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yer grammer is purty weak fer CEOs..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But par for the course for a President, prolly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If not the chairman of the Federal Reserve, eh?
>>>>
>>>> "I did not have sex with that woman"...
>>>>
>>>> "Depends on how you define the meaning of is"...
>>>>
>>
>> http://www.infowars.com/saved%20pages/Prior_Knowledge/Clinton_let_bin_laden.htm 
>>
>>
>> Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize
>> Sudan offered up the terrorist and data on his network. The 
>> then-president and his advisors didn't respond.
>>
>> By MANSOOR IJAZ
> 
> 
> 
> You may not trot that 

And more!

http://www.benadorassociates.com/article/354

The unearthing of documents directly linking Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda 
organization to Saddam Hussein this weekend may have hermetically sealed 
the Bush administration's case that dismantling Iraq's Baathist 
enterprise was in part necessary to undo terrorism's dynamic duo. But 
closing that case may reopen a Pandora's box for ex-Clinton 
administration officials who still believe their policy prescriptions 
protected U.S. national interests against the growing threat of 
terrorism during the past decade.

The London Telegraph's weekend revelations raise deeply disturbing 
questions about the extent and magnitude to which President Clinton, his 
national-security adviser Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger, and senior terrorism 
and State Department officials � including Assistant Secretary of State 
for East Africa, Susan Rice � politicized intelligence data, relied on 
and even circulated fabricated evidence in making critical 
national-security decisions, and presided over a string of intelligence 
failures during the months leading up to the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings 
in Kenya and Tanzania.

Analysis of documents found in the rubble of Iraq's intelligence 
headquarters show that contrary to conventional wisdom, Iraqi military 
and intelligence officials sought out al Qaeda leaders, not the other 
way around, and ultimately met with bin Laden on at least two occasions. 
They also show that channels of communication between al Qaeda and Iraq 
were created much earlier and were wider ranging in scope than 
previously thought.

The timing of the meetings sheds important new light on how grave the 
Clinton administration's intelligence failures may have been.

On February 19, 1998, about six months prior to the attacks in Dar Es 
Salaam and Nairobi, Iraqi intelligence officials set in motion a plan to 
bring a senior and trusted bin Laden aide to Baghdad from Khartoum. One 
of the key Mukhabarat intelligence documents shows that a recommendation 
was made for "�the deputy director general to bring the [bin Laden] 
envoy to Iraq because we may find in this envoy a way to maintain 
contacts with bin Laden." The meetings took place in March 1998.

The initial program to have the terror talks last for one week was 
extended to two because of the success in whatever nefarious plans were 
being hatched. The meetings also laid the groundwork for Iraq's former 
intelligence chief, Farouk Hijazi, arrested last Friday in Iraq, to meet 
with bin Laden in December 1998 in Afghanistan. Press reports also 
chronicled an earlier meeting between Hijazi and bin Laden in Sudan in 1994.

Baghdad, however, was not the only game in town. While Saddam was busy 
trying to find a formula for embracing and employing al Qaeda's budding 
global terror network to attack U.S. interests, Sudan was busy trying to 
alert Western intelligence officials � including those at the National 
Security Council, the State Department's Terrorism Bureau, the Federal 
Bureau of Investigation, and the Central Intelligence Agency � of the 
dangers still lurking in Khartoum's sandblasted neighborhoods after bin 
Laden's May 1996 expulsion.

A brief chronology demonstrates how compelling the Sudan's offer to turn 
over terrorism data might have been in thwarting attacks on U.S. 
citizens and assets overseas, and how mendacious a narrow clique of 
Clinton officials were in not taking advantage of those efforts.

Serious Sam wrote:

> Orwellian Prophecy wrote:
> 
>> Serious Sam wrote:
>>
>>> Orwellian Prophecy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Serious Sam wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Spammay Blockay wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <G6p4d.1301593$ic1.132435@news.easynews.com>,
>>>>>> Serious Sam  <bitbucket> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CEO Council wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We here in the CEO Council are very happy the stock market has went
>>>>>>>> down 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yer grammer is purty weak fer CEOs..
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But par for the course for a President, prolly.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If not the chairman of the Federal Reserve, eh?
>>>>>
>>>>> "I did not have sex with that woman"...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Depends on how you define the meaning of is"...
>>>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.infowars.com/saved%20pages/Prior_Knowledge/Clinton_let_bin_laden.htm 
>>>
>>>
>>> Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize
>>> Sudan offered up the terrorist and data on his network. The 
>>> then-president and his advisors didn't respond.
>>>
>>> By MANSOOR IJAZ
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> You may not trot that 
> 
> 
> And more!
> 
> http://www.benadorassociates.com/article/354
> 

Over a year and a half old and proven to be untrue.

How many lies can you post as if they had any weight?  You're a blind 
sack of shit.

Orwellian Prophecy wrote:


>>>> http://www.infowars.com/saved%20pages/Prior_Knowledge/Clinton_let_bin_laden.htm 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize
>>>> Sudan offered up the terrorist and data on his network. The 
>>>> then-president and his advisors didn't respond.
>>>>
>>>> By MANSOOR IJAZ
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You may not trot that 
>>
>>
>>
>> And more!
>>
>> http://www.benadorassociates.com/article/354
>>
> 
> Over a year and a half old 

OCTOBER 27, 1996. In a confidential memorandum I wrote to Sandy Berger 
to follow up on the August 1996 meeting he and Susan Rice (then a 
National Security Council official) had called me to the White House for 
to discuss U.S.-Sudan relations, I recounted events of my first meeting 
with the new Sudanese intelligence chief, Lt. Gen. Gutbi al-Mahdi, just 
days earlier � a meeting whose consequence even I did not fully grasp at 
the time:




�the purpose of my meeting [with al-Mahdi] was to see if we could glean 
any insights into the data Sudan has on those who have been attending 
the Popular Arab & Islamic Conference meetings convened by [Sudan's 
theological leader Hassan] Turabi. As you recall, during our August 
meeting, I told you I thought this data could be invaluable in genuinely 
assessing terrorism risk from Sudan and neighboring countries� His 
[al-Mahdi's] central contention is that Sudan is prepared to share data 
on those people attending the conferences and belonging to banned 
groups, such as Hamas, Hezbollah, Egyptian Islamic Jihad, Jamaah 
Islamiyah, and others, if we are prepared to genuinely engage and incent 
the Sudan away from its present course. He complained bitterly about 
repeated efforts to communicate with the administration, which are as I 
understand it, being blocked at very low levels because of what he 
called "blind spots."He showed me some files in which the data seemed 
pretty compelling � names, bio data like dates and places of birth, 
passport copies to show nationality, recent travel itineraries in some 
cases and a brief description of each individual to delineate which 
groups they claim loyalties to. In short, it seemed to me everything we 
discussed in August was available. Strongly suggest we test the Sudanese 
on the data, perhaps even try to get at the data on an unconditional basis�


Berger's secretary, Kris, confirmed he had received and read the memo. 
Berger's reply: We'll evaluate this after the election. Election day 
came and went. No action was taken.


 > and proven to be untrue.

By who, YOU?

Where?

When?

Cite!

Come on asswipe, bring it!