🚀 go-pugleaf

Oh what a relief - I have thought often of the things you say here but I
just get tired of the abuse and short sighted comments I receive when I post
in what the hard core believers deem to be in the negative.



Mr. Dangerous wrote in message <34D7D181.B21390D9@cris.com>...
>I find sex talk/chat to be revolting and I am far from a prude.  Even
>though I don't have children, I don't like the idea of the possibility
>that minors might be involved.  I am not posting this to piss anybody
>off, but before you flame me, think of your children or the children of
>people you know.
>
>
>
>BabyDoll wrote:
>> I am continually intrigued about net sex. Of course our www is full of
sex
>> sites but do a browse of IRC channels and you are innundated with sex
>> channels. Now I am no prude - in fact far from it - I love and adore sex
>> with both members of the genders but to hide behind a keyboard night
after
>> night and play with yourself really seems rather dull.
>> I know some people don't get sex for a variety of reasons but I know of
>> people that do get it regular and still spend hours net sexing. I have
also
>> noticed that the majority of these people are male - is it the head with
no
>> brain rules?
>> I have a theory these people that seemingly have good sex lives that
spend
>> time net sexing/phone sexing are focussing on sex to fill a void
currently
>> in their lives. Quite possibly an emotional void. Sex is a great way of
>> doing that and on the net anonymously in most instances.
>> What do others think?
>--
>------------------------------------------------
>IMPORTANT: My e-mail address, above, is INVALID.
>If you need to e-mail me, visit my home page at:
>http://www.concentric.net/~glvreg/homepage.shtml
>I have used a FALSE e-mail address to avoid bulk
>junk e-mail which clutters my mailbox every day.
>------------------------------------------------