🚀 go-pugleaf

Thank you Rick for giving your viewpoint in an intelligent manner.

I agree for the most part of what you say.


Rick wrote in message <01bd314d$6f793860$63bc0ccb@oemcomputer>...
>
>
>BabyDoll <babydoll-@NOSPAM.rocketmail.com> wrote in article
><6b85kv$7m4$1@s3000-01.magna.com.au>...
>> I am continually intrigued about net sex.
>
>snip
>
>>
>> I have a theory these people that seemingly have good sex lives that
>spend
>> time net sexing/phone sexing are focussing on sex to fill a void
>currently
>> in their lives. Quite possibly an emotional void. Sex is a great way of
>> doing that and on the net anonymously in most instances.
>>
>> What do others think?
>>
>
>I have to admit to being a netsex virgin.  Sure I've gone along with things
>for a while, but I always end up howling with laughter and have to give up.
>
>
>A couple of ideas I could suggest is theat in some couples the patners have
>widely differing sex drives, but the more "active" partners prefers to
>remain faithful.  That of course raises the question of whether or not
>netsex is cheating, a minefield which I shall deftly sidestep.  Then there
>are some where one partner is bi-curious, mostly the male, and experiments
>via the net usually pretending to be female to see whether it turns them on
>or not.
>
>That of course doesn't cover all those with good sex lives who regardless
>indulge in netsex, but I'll add those two reasons to the list or theories.
>
>Cheers
>
>Rick