Article View: alt.is.not
Article #1Re: VOTE YES - Allow hard drug discussions in Usenet
From: P J Volk
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 00:00
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 00:00
46 lines
2621 bytes
2621 bytes
In <4i4a4a$o2@scramble.lm.com> drg@manus.org (DrG) writes: [newsgroup degruborfied somewhat] > >It comes from over 40 years of studyint the streets >and watching Drugs of all kinds, and watching what they >DO to people! and recognizing the DIFFERENCE between >HARD DRUGS and cannabis! > Yes, and being a user of cannabis, you are completely unbaised, yes? If I ask that junkie in the street, he might say pot is a brain-eating drug. You recognize nothing because of your bias. Sure people might not think you act wierd, but then they are probably smoking the same shit as you are. I've seen what drugs to people, and have heard discussions, and that is why I don't do drugs, and can work and live. >>-Dr. Zando >> > >the NO vote is a vote AGAINST censorship >and FOR separating pot from HARD DRUGS! Pot is a hard drug. It is a classified substance. It is ILLEGAL. That alone should keep you from indulging in it. And crossposting is censorship, moreso than moderation. Crossposting was the Church ladies who interrupted Catholic services (member that Mr. Grubor?) Drowning out someone speaking is preventing him from speaking. And no "Well, he could be heard at a distance of ten inches" doesn't count. The one thing to remember about moderation is that there are other places to discuss items. No, you don't need to discuss the heresies in the Bible in christnet. No, you don't need to crosspost into alt.promisekeepers. Pat V. (Working for Her Majesty's Navy, God Help Queen Hillary) > >DrG
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4i5gof$gtp@reader2.ix.netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4hja5v$1qd0@usenetz1.news.prodigy.com> <ya3f7fscx5.fsf_-_@mr4.mr.ams.org> <4i42u8$om@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <4i4a4a$o2@scramble.lm.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 100ecf,afea568f4e6cd730,start X-Google-Attributes: gid100ecf,public X-Google-Thread: 1139f4,ceb4ba36e722d353 X-Google-Attributes: gid1139f4,public X-Google-Thread: 10f35e,ceb4ba36e722d353 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f35e,public X-Google-Thread: 111873,ceb4ba36e722d353 X-Google-Attributes: gid111873,public X-Google-Thread: 1042ac,afea568f4e6cd730,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1042ac,public X-Google-Thread: f764a,ceb4ba36e722d353 X-Google-Attributes: gidf764a,public From: pjvolk@ix.netcom.com(P J Volk ) Subject: Re: VOTE YES - Allow hard drug discussions in Usenet Date: 1996/03/13 Message-ID: <4i5gof$gtp@reader2.ix.netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 142382454 references: <4hja5v$1qd0@usenetz1.news.prodigy.com> <ya3f7fscx5.fsf_-_@mr4.mr.ams.org> <4i42u8$om@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <4i4a4a$o2@scramble.lm.com> organization: Netcom x-netcom-date: Tue Mar 12 7:51:43 PM PST 1996 newsgroups: alt.is.not,alt.drugs.pot,alt.is.too,news.admin.misc,soc.culture.usa,earth.general