🚀 go-pugleaf

In <DM012s.9BI@blaze.trentu.ca> sberry@ivory.trentu.ca (EVIL CABBAGE
UNLIMITED) writes: 
>
>In article <4efdju$8fl@nntp.crl.com>, tzimon@crl.com (Tzimon Yliaster)
writes:
>
>>
>>All of Usenet is not a forum for Grubor et al's tempests-in-teapots
and 
>>responses to them.  What's going on isn't spam, and it isn't
velveeta, 
>>and I don't even know if it can be fit on some kind of index, but it 
>>clearly constitutes some sort of abuse, as Usenet was never intended
to 
>>be a forum for rolling flamewars like this.
>>
>
>This is exactly my argument against Grubor's 'home newsgroup' thing. I
>hang around at tor.general and I am sure that no one there gives a 
>rat's ass about what Grubor and Boursy are complaining about in this
>newsgroup. It clutters the group up.
>
Look, Evil Cabbage/Shawn -- you missed the whole fucking point.
Nobody here wants to post to your tor.general group, but if somebody
involved in a thread lists the tor.general as their "home group" than
you are obligated to leave his/her group in there.

Now you did the right thing here and left my alt.is group in, so you
are not reprehensible.  I never posted to any tor.general group anyway,
so don't blame me.  But I apparently responded to an article that had
tor.general in it, and I do not chop headers.

Do you understand this now?

Cheers,

DrG