Article View: alt.lang.asm
Article #123Re: DRAM refresh rates
From: robert.k.nichols
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 01:29
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 01:29
26 lines
1870 bytes
1870 bytes
In article <1992Dec27.105039.25690@microsoft.com> chuckst@microsoft.com (Chuck Strouss) writes: ... >It is surprising how long some DRAMs can go without refresh. For >production systems, you must believe the manufacturers worst-case >specs, but DRAMs rarely need to be refreshed that often. ... The length of time that a DRAM cell can hold its content without refresh is inversely proportional to the leakage current in the device. The leakage current, in turn, is an *exponential* function of temperature. What this boils down to is that a device with cells that must be refreshed every 2 ms at max rated temperature will hold information for over 20 SECONDS at a junction temperature of 25 C. One particularly nasty consequence of this is that it becomes very difficult to tell whether refresh is working correctly in your system, and even harder to devise a test which will reliably detect memory cells that might be marginal (from a refresh standpoint) at high temperatures. My apologies if the numbers aren't quite correct. It's been some time since I've worked in this area (since the days of 2 ms refresh requirements, in fact), and my memory is a bit hazy. Bob Nichols AT&T Bell Laboratories rnichols@ihlpm.ih.att.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec29.012957.14287@cbfsb.cb.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsk!cbnewsj!att-out!cbfsb!cbnewsg.cb.att.com!rnicholsReferences:
<1992Dec15.205835.643@zooid.guild.org> <1gske7INNgje@coli-gate.coli.uni-sb.de> <1992Dec27.105039.25690@microsoft.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: alt.lang.asm,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsk!cbnewsj!att-out!cbfsb!cbnewsg.cb.att.com!rnichols From: rnichols@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (robert.k.nichols) Subject: Re: DRAM refresh rates Message-ID: <1992Dec29.012957.14287@cbfsb.cb.att.com> Summary: Extremely sensitive to temperature Sender: news@cbfsb.cb.att.com Organization: AT&T References: <1992Dec15.205835.643@zooid.guild.org> <1gske7INNgje@coli-gate.coli.uni-sb.de> <1992Dec27.105039.25690@microsoft.com> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 01:29:57 GMT Lines: 26