Article View: alt.lang.basic
Article #246Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but wh
From: John Hutchinson
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 22:31
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 22:31
14 lines
1160 bytes
1160 bytes
In article 12678@julian.uwo.ca, wlsmith@valve.heart.rri.uwo.ca (Wayne Smith) writes: >Flame me all you want, but if some obscure UK language developed 20 >years ago can make it into a comp.lang group, why is basic still shit-upon >and relegated to the status of an alt group? (alt.lang.basic)? Old prejudices die hard, Wayne. <sigh> --- ___________________________ John "HUTCH" Hutchinson _________________________ _________________ Fair Dinkum Technologies Member - IAAD _______________ ________________ "No worries, mate... it's from Fair Dinkum!" _______________ ____________ email: hutch@bellman.lanl.gov GEnie: FAIR-DINKUM _____________
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov12.223106.28840@newshost.lanl.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ornl!sunova!linac!uwm.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!lanl!ilmen!hutchReferences:
<1992Nov12.163410.12678@julian.uwo.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: alt.lang.basic Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ornl!sunova!linac!uwm.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!lanl!ilmen!hutch From: hutch@bellman.lanl.gov (John Hutchinson) Subject: Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but wh Message-ID: <1992Nov12.223106.28840@newshost.lanl.gov> Sender: news@newshost.lanl.gov Reply-To: hutch@bellman.lanl.gov Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory References: <1992Nov12.163410.12678@julian.uwo.ca> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 22:31:06 GMT Lines: 16