Article View: alt.lang.basic
Article #248Something tells me comp.lang.basic wouldn't fly
From: Wayne Smith
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 14:51
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 14:51
11 lines
1040 bytes
1040 bytes
I have gotten a fair amount of e-mail asking "So why don't you start a RFD or RFV for comp.lang.basic. Sure, a lot of people (me included) get enough out of alt.lang.basic, but some places don't get alt groups, and there's also a principle involved here (that a major programming language is kept out of the comp.lang hierarchy). With some of the negative comments about basic a few posts back, something tells me that a lot of basic trashers would come out of the woodwork and vote down comp.sys.basic. Surely a vote has been tried before? Does anyone know the results?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov13.145125.11147@julian.uwo.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!torn!newshost.uwo.ca!valve.heart.rri.uwo.ca!wlsmithShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: alt.lang.basic Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!torn!newshost.uwo.ca!valve.heart.rri.uwo.ca!wlsmith From: wlsmith@valve.heart.rri.uwo.ca (Wayne Smith) Subject: Something tells me comp.lang.basic wouldn't fly Organization: (this space for rent) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 14:51:25 GMT Message-ID: <1992Nov13.145125.11147@julian.uwo.ca> Sender: news@julian.uwo.ca (USENET News System) Nntp-Posting-Host: valve.heart.rri.uwo.ca Lines: 11