Re: basic not a real language

Article View: alt.lang.basic

Article #300

#300

From: tabitha
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:32

8 lines
851 bytes

I couldn't agree more with the critics.  Basic is a retarded language
for brain damaged and emotionally stunted people.  But we inferior
races have a right to do things in our own backward way, don't we,
struggling along with our very limited capacities.

Why do  you critics make fun of mental cripples like us?  Why aren't
you spending your time creating killer apps with your real
languages?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Nov16.163240.725@vms.huji.ac.il>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!news.netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!ub4b!news.cs.kuleuven.ac.be!blekul11!frmop11!barilvm!vms.huji.ac.il!tabitha

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!news.netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!ub4b!news.cs.kuleuven.ac.be!blekul11!frmop11!barilvm!vms.huji.ac.il!tabitha
From: tabitha@vms.huji.ac.il
Newsgroups: alt.lang.basic
Subject: Re: basic not a real language
Message-ID: <1992Nov16.163240.725@vms.huji.ac.il>
Date: 16 Nov 92 16:32:40 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Lines: 8