🚀 go-pugleaf

On 14 Feb 1997 08:14:59 GMT, rls2497@unix.tamu.edu (Randall Leroy Speaks)
wrote:

>In article <5dvf62$egf2@venus.compulink.gr>,
>Michael Iordanakis <xamogela@compulink.gr> wrote:
>>
>>Pascal is far more advanced than basic. This means that lots of pascal
>>procedures, functions or statements are not easily converted to Basic
>>because machine code must be used. 
>
>a math professor had a wonderful term for a statement like this...
>a WAG.  how can you possibly plop in here among educated people and
>expect to justify such a presumtuous claim? if you had said C, or C++
>you would have been much more credible.  i wouldn't be surprised if you
>think basic is still line numbers.
>
>by the way, WAG stands for Wild-Ass Guess

The score now stands:

 Randy: 10  Mike: -10


  ____    _    ____      ____  _____
 |  _ \  / \  / ___) __ | ___)(_   _)  Nutz'n Bolts
 | |_)  / _ \ \____\/  \|  _)   | |   PowerBASIC PBL
 |____//_/ \_\(____/\__/|_|     |_|    N-B-V206.ZIP