Thread View: alt.lang.basic
4 messages
4 total messages
Started by Mr N Benci
Tue, 08 Sep 1992 22:48
Compiled BASIC for the ATARI ST's
Author: Mr N Benci
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 1992 22:48
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 1992 22:48
20 lines
1485 bytes
1485 bytes
I am about to invest some money in a compiled basic. The only criteria is that it must be closely compatible to Quick Basic for the PC. Hisoft BASIC 2 is advertised to be compatible to Quick Basic. Is anyone using this BASIC and if so, could you provide some useful comments, either good bad or ugly. Any comments would be most appreciated, as I would like to know more about it before I send my money to Hisoft. Thanks in advance. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ * Nino Benci. * Confucious say * * Monash University, Caulfield Campus * 'Never stand alone against * * Physics Department * ignorance' * * 900 Dandenong Rd, Caulfield East **************************************** * VIC, 3145. Australia. * * Tel (61) (3) 573 2355/2519. Fax (61) (3) 573 2350 * * email oz: rdt154k@monu6.cc.monash.oz.au * * email world: rdt154k%monu6.cc.monash.edu.au@uunet.uu.net * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Compiled BASIC for the ATARI ST's
Author: Daniel M Goldman
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 14:35
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 14:35
16 lines
1392 bytes
1392 bytes
In <1992Sep8.224814.12128@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> rdt154k@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (Mr N Benci) writes: >I am about to invest some money in a compiled basic. The only criteria is >that it must be closely compatible to Quick Basic for the PC. Hisoft BASIC 2 >is advertised to be compatible to Quick Basic. Is anyone using this BASIC >and if so, could you provide some useful comments, either good bad or ugly. >Any comments would be most appreciated, as I would like to know more about >it before I send my money to Hisoft. >Thanks in advance. Before you buy, I suggest you look into True Basic. I believe they have a translation program to convert code to and from Quick Basic, but I'm not sure. If you are interested, I will send you the contacts. -DmG Dan Goldman, Ames, Iowa, USA
Re: Compiled BASIC for the ATARI ST's
Author: Phil Nelson
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 00:43
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 00:43
24 lines
1620 bytes
1620 bytes
I have an Amiga, not an Atari, but my experience may be similar. a couple o years ago I bought the HiSoft compiler and the True BASIC compiler for the Amiga. neither one was great, but the HiSoft was compatible with QuickBASIC 3.? (not the 4.x that was out at the time). True BASIC for the Amiga was not very close to QuickBASIC, and the Amiga version of that time came with nothing that could translate. In some ways, the Atari is closer to a PC than the Amiga, so your situation might be better, but be careful. I had a fairly complex (about 2k lines) non-graphical QuickBASIC 4.0 program that I wanted to run on the Amiga, I put the project on hold because it would been practically impossible with HiSoft, and very tedious with TrueBASIC. If you havn't made use of the recursive calls and other nice features of 4.0+, or HiSoft has a 4.0+ compatible version, you might be in good shape. I hope my info is not totally out of date, it has been a while... -- Phil Nelson . pnelson@tymix.Tymnet.COM . San Jose, CA, USA . 408-922-7508 "Every improvement in communication makes the bore more terrible."
Hisoft Basic (Was: Re: Compiled BASIC for the ATARI ST's)
Author: Jarto 'Robin' Tarpio
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 23:02
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 23:02
54 lines
2890 bytes
2890 bytes
In article <2480@tymix.Tymnet.COM> pnelson@cobra.Tymnet.COM (Phil Nelson) writes: > In some ways, the Atari is closer to a PC than the Amiga, so your situation > might be better, but be careful. I had a fairly complex (about 2k lines) > non-graphical QuickBASIC 4.0 program that I wanted to run on the Amiga, > I put the project on hold because it would been practically impossible > with HiSoft, and very tedious with TrueBASIC. Well... Nothing is impossible with the Hisoft compiler on the Amiga. I have made Application Windows-servers and used the functions in the new OS. If Hisoft lacks some features, they can easily be coded by using system library calls. But porting isn't easy when you do it first time. I first make the programs on the Amiga and then port it to the PC. Boy, did I disappoint the first time when I hit the damned string space and segment limits. Anyway, when you have done it once or twice, it will be easy. I ported my latest 12000 lines program from Amiga to PC in one week. When posting from PC to Amiga, the most problematic areas are: - ISAM - You have to make own database handling. (So what ? It only takes a couple of days and is faster) - recods and other "high level" variable handling. (Well...They can be simulated wth variable names, don't they ?) - character-graphics. (You should use the graphics capabilities of the Amiga or you program is from the stone-age) And from Amiga to PC: - heavy string space useage. (Amiga gives you Megs of memory, PC only about 64K) - huge SUBs or FUNCTIONs that may be too big for BC. - graphics. (Face it... QB and BC7 are mainly character based) - multiple windows, menus (Maybe VB4DOS have them, otherways you have to simulate them) - multitasking, heavy calling of system functions, AREXX and all the other goodies of the Amiga... If you havn't made use of the recursive calls and other nice features of 4.0+, or HiSoft has a 4.0+ compatible version, you might be in good shape. Recursion works with Hisoft. I hope my info is not totally out of date, it has been a while... I'm currently waiting for an early beta of Hisoft Basic II.... drooling :-) /robin
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads