Re: Religious question -- negative arguments for S

Article View: alt.lang.teco

Article #8

From: Bob Pasker
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 05:33

8 lines
570 bytes

forw what it's worth: i'm just glad to see some postings here!

(and hi kpt, if you're there)

-- 
--- bob pasker
---- rbp@netcom.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6-snlgk.rbp@netcom.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!rbp

References: <DRW.92Sep8135859@nevanlinna.mit.edu> <1992Sep9.124025.1@cc.newcastle.edu.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: alt.lang.teco
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!rbp
From: rbp@netcom.com (Bob Pasker)
Subject: Re: Religious question -- negative arguments for S
Message-ID: <6-snlgk.rbp@netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 92 05:33:46 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
References: <DRW.92Sep8135859@nevanlinna.mit.edu> <1992Sep9.124025.1@cc.newcastle.edu.au>
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message